Canlan Sports - Libertyville - Libertyville, IL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MITEV Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 24% | |
| 2 | JOVANOVIC Jovan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | |
| 3 | ZIEGLER John | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 28% |
| 3 | FELICIANO Damien | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 8% | |
| 5 | HUANG Kenneth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 9% |
| 6 | NOWAK Jakub P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 41% | |
| 7 | PECKENS Tyler | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 49% | 7% |
| 8 | MUNLIN Donovan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 30% | |
| 9 | CONKLIN Jim | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 22% | |
| 10 | KARNAS Karol | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% | |
| 11 | LINDOW Connor | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 16% | |
| 12 | WOJCIECHOWSKI Matthew N. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 22% | |
| 12 | SIEDOW William | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 32% | 3% | |
| 14 | SOBESHKEVYCH ROMAN | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 24% | |
| 15 | CURTY Jack | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% |
| 16 | HONG Daniel | 100% | 63% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 17 | WILLIAMS Logan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 50% | 13% | 1% |
| 18 | ROWLAND Marsden | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 23% | 3% |
| 19 | ASGARALLY Anthony | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 47% | 10% | |
| 20 | LUCERO-OLSON Aydin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 21% |
| 21 | SPIER Julian H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 67% |
| 22 | LARSON Vaughn | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 23 | GRAVES Lawson | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 8% | |
| 24 | THOMAS Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 25% | |
| 25 | BISSEN Quinn | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 15% | 1% | |
| 26 | BEACH John | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 40% | 7% | |
| 27 | SEABLOOM Jack | 100% | 94% | 67% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 28 | TOLLEFSON Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% |
| 29 | SNYDER Alex | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 11% | 1% | |
| 30 | ARZT Nicholas | 100% | 95% | 65% | 19% | 2% | - | |
| 31 | SLEZAK Christian | 100% | 62% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 32 | YATES Graeme | 100% | 66% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 33 | HALL Gabriel | 100% | 76% | 32% | 6% | - | - | |
| 34 | KOHLER Florian | 100% | 81% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 35 | BROSNAN Solomon | 100% | 70% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 36 | WYCHULIS Tristan | 100% | 79% | 34% | 6% | - | - | |
| 37 | KRAJ Pawel | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 26% | 4% | |
| 38 | ROBBINS Christopher (Chris) W. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 9% | - |
| 39 | JERDEE Colton | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | ELLIS, IV Floyd | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 41 | SWANSON Dave | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
| 42 | COSGROVE Franklin | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 43 | PREIDL Matthias | 100% | 79% | 32% | 6% | - | - | |
| 44 | SHOEMAKER Oliver | 100% | 82% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 45 | NASSOS Eric | 100% | 92% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 46 | LEBIHAN Frank | 100% | 97% | 77% | 37% | 8% | - | |
| 47 | ALI Adam | 100% | 92% | 58% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 48 | OBERLY Nicholas | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 5% | - | |
| 49 | SWENSON Diego | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 50 | CHRISTIAN John R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 24% | 4% |
| 51 | MARRS Hayden | 100% | 79% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | KUNKUNURI tarun | 100% | 62% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 53 | WU Jia Y. | 100% | 88% | 46% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | CASTELLANOS Rene E. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 55 | PAPP Mike | 100% | 93% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 56 | CHEN Raymond | 100% | 83% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 56 | BAO Kangdi | 100% | 84% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.