MAPLEWOOD, NJ - MAPLEWOOD, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WOODS Jack H. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 54% |
| 2 | YANG Adam | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 43% | 20% |
| 3 | HU Oliver W. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 28% |
| 3 | VANNI Filippo A. | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 9% | |
| 5 | WU Albert | - | 7% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 5% | |
| 6 | RECHLER Logan | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 10% | |
| 7 | LIANG Lixi (Henry) | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 40% | 16% | |
| 8 | BALL James T. | 2% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 9 | LEUNG Wai Chi Ethan | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% |
| 10 | SCHULTES Evans | - | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | |
| 11 | JIMENEZ Diran | - | 4% | 23% | 41% | 27% | 6% | |
| 12 | BAE Kevin | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 13 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 1% |
| 14 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 15 | BAS Liam | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
| 16 | SHIKHMAN Robert | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 17 | AUGUSTINE Ethan A. | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% | |
| 18 | LIAO Alex J. | 1% | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 19 | LOCKWOOD Owen | - | - | 6% | 27% | 43% | 23% | |
| 20 | KIM Tei D. | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% | |
| 21 | HOOSHI Dylan M. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 33% | |
| 22 | DU Samuel R. | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | |
| 23 | WU Jerry | - | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 24 | LUTAR Lucas N. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 72% |
| 25 | VASILIEV Sacha M. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 38% | 9% |
| 26 | MATHEWS Rocco J. | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
| 27 | GOGUEN-COMPAGNONI Nicholas | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% | |
| 28 | O'BRIEN Jack K. | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% | |
| 29 | REZNICK Nicholas J. | 1% | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 30 | DING Jonathan | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 31 | WEINKOPF William O. | 4% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 32 | ANTON Nathaniel | 2% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 33 | KAO Castor T. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 2% |
| 34 | MACRAE Harrison A. | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 35 | ORTIZ Zachary M. | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% | |
| 36 | GALLUCCI Charles John | 7% | 31% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 37 | KAZA Nitish | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 38 | AHN Jun | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 39 | BREIER Matthew F. | - | 7% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 3% | |
| 39 | KIM Yonjae | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% | |
| 41 | LE Vyn A. | 7% | 47% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | DEGREMONT Henri S. | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% | |
| 43 | NAGER Noah | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 44 | ECK Nathaniel | 16% | 42% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 45 | ALLAMPALLAM Maanav V. | 5% | 30% | 39% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 46 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | 1% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 47 | MENG Zhaoyi | 10% | 36% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 48 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | 40% | 42% | 15% | 3% | - | - | |
| 49 | ZHAO Jesse | 40% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
| 50 | VAZQUEZ Sebastian A. | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 51 | WERWA Griffith | 35% | 41% | 19% | 4% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | DESOLA Aidan J. | 8% | 35% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 53 | SCHENCK Koen M. | 1% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
| 54 | SHREM Samuel G. | 81% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 55 | BURNS Andrew | 61% | 33% | 6% | 1% | - | - | |
| 56 | ARANA Massimo | 78% | 21% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 57 | OUYANG Matt J. | 26% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 57 | ZHANG Zixuan "Mark" | 58% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.