MAPLEWOOD, NJ - MAPLEWOOD, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WHELAN Thomas (Tony) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% | |
| 2 | KANG Michael H. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 6% | |
| 3 | PAVLENISHVILI David G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 27% | |
| 3 | KIM Juni C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 42% | |
| 5 | MERCHANT Reza H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 45% |
| 6 | MARCHANT Albert J. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 8% | |
| 7 | SPANO Gideon S. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 8 | SOOMRO Adam A. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% | |
| 9 | GAIDAR Daniel B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% |
| 10 | ZHANG Matthew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 13% | |
| 11 | MARRAN Erik R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 19% | 2% |
| 12 | ELAMURUGAN Kavin | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
| 13 | MORSE Tyler | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 15% | |
| 14 | HERMANSON David B. | 100% | 74% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 15 | HONG James | 100% | 84% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 16 | BOWERMAN Lucas A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 33% | 5% |
| 17 | GANA Jr Jorge M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 22% | 3% |
| 18 | RA Jr. Daniel M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 21% | |
| 19 | SIDDIQUI Humza K. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 15% | 1% | |
| 20 | SHREM Samuel G. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 9% | |
| 21 | LIBSON Tazman | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 21% | |
| 22 | FELDMAN Jaemin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 7% | |
| 23 | CHEUNG Liyan | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 24 | FERREIRA Noah J. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 25 | LANGTON Sawyer | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 10% | 1% | |
| 26 | JACKSON Anthony I. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
| 27 | SHAH Maximilian A. | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 28 | GOHEL Dayus T. | 100% | 96% | 72% | 33% | 7% | 1% | |
| 29 | DIAS-LALCACA Kieran P. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 30 | LI Jeffrey | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
| 31 | TONG Chihao | 100% | 95% | 67% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 32 | WADE Grayson | 100% | 54% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 33 | MACKIN Samuel | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 3% | |
| 34 | DOUGLAS Colin F. | 100% | 93% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 34 | KUMAR Anitya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 21% | |
| 36 | YOO David D. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 2% | |
| 37 | REYES Vincent | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | |
| 38 | DIXON Samuel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 6% | |
| 39 | YOSHIDA Stephen R. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% | |
| 40 | DIXON Thomas | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 40 | DISIMONE David Z. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% | |
| 42 | PAHLAVI Kamran | 100% | 77% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | PARK Brian | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 44 | MENZIE Kevin | 100% | 95% | 67% | 25% | 4% | - | |
| 45 | STANLEY Dominick | 100% | 51% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 46 | BLANCHARD Jonah | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 47 | WU Joseph | 100% | 81% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 48 | KWONG Jason | 100% | 76% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | HE Lawrence | 100% | 79% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 50 | ANDERSON Riley | 100% | 72% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.