MAPLEWOOD, NJ - MAPLEWOOD, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | JIMENEZ Diran | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 59% | 19% |
| 2 | LEUNG Wai Chi Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 38% |
| 3 | SHA Yi Peng | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 3 | HOOSHI Dylan M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 48% |
| 5 | BAS Liam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 10% |
| 6 | BAE Kevin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
| 7 | LIN Richard W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% |
| 8 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 9 | VASILIEV Sacha M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 31% |
| 10 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% |
| 11 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% | |
| 12 | BREIER Matthew F. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 13 | LE Vyn A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 49% | 11% | 1% |
| 14 | KWON Ethan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 9% | |
| 15 | WEINKOPF William O. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% | |
| 16 | WU Jerry | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 7% |
| 17 | LI Richard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 23% |
| 18 | NAGER Noah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 11% |
| 19 | GALLUCCI Charles John | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 21% | 3% |
| 20 | REZNICK Nicholas J. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 7% | |
| 21 | MENG Zhaoyi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 48% | 11% | 1% |
| 22 | BALL James T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 6% |
| 23 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 9% |
| 24 | SHIKHMAN Robert | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% | |
| 25 | SCHENCK Koen M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 11% | |
| 26 | AHN Jun | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 27 | KAO Castor T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 9% |
| 28 | SHIN Joshua J. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 64% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
| 29 | ANTON Nathaniel | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 30 | ALLAMPALLAM Maanav V. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 31 | DEGREMONT Henri S. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 75% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 32 | BAO Wenyuan | 100% | 99% | 82% | 33% | 6% | - | - |
| 33 | DESOLA Aidan J. | 100% | 99% | 84% | 48% | 15% | 2% | |
| 34 | PAN Eric | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 20% | 3% | |
| 35 | VERSTEELE Sander | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 36 | DU Samuel R. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 37 | HONG Issac | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% | |
| 38 | WEI William | 100% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | OUYANG Matt J. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 40 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | 100% | 92% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 41 | WERWA Griffith | 100% | 93% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 41 | ARANA Massimo | 100% | 60% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 43 | KLEIN Sebastian W. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 44 | NG Jeremiah | 100% | 93% | 38% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 45 | TAHOUN Mostafa | 100% | 99% | 84% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 46 | KITAGAWA Eric S. | 100% | 99% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 47 | SYOMICHEV Gleb A. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 48 | MCLENDON Diego | 100% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 48 | ZHANG Zixuan "Mark" | 100% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 50 | ZHAO Jesse | 100% | 86% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 51 | MECINSKI Henrik | 100% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 52 | TOMRUK Batu | 100% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 53 | DE JAGER Robert | 100% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 54 | GUO Sean | 100% | 67% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.