Greater Richmond Convention Center - Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | RODNEY Adam R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% |
| 2 | TEPEDELENLIOGLU Mehmet | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | |
| 3 | MANDOKI Sandor I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% |
| 3 | MENDOZA Zandro | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 11% | - | |
| 5 | MACZIK Adam W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 61% |
| 6 | GATES Darcy C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 23% | |
| 7 | SUVOROV Yuly | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 21% | 2% |
| 8 | HUDSON Jeffrey (Jeff) A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 21% |
| 9 | CHENG Thomas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 8% |
| 10 | PHO Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 32% | |
| 11 | HEDGES Philip S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 52% |
| 12 | LEHFELDT Damien S. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 22% | 3% | - |
| 13 | LICHTEN Keith H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 56% |
| 14 | FRANK Fred | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 68% | 24% | |
| 15 | SNIDER Jeffrey H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 42% | 9% |
| 15 | GREGORY Dean | 100% | 99% | 85% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 17 | GERSEN Jacob | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
| 18 | DEUCHER Joseph H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 19% |
| 19 | LEE Tobias (Toby) T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% |
| 20 | OLIVERIUS Joseph W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% |
| 21 | CRANOR Erich L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 20% |
| 22 | COETZEE Frans M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 4% |
| 23 | MAZZOLI Julio C. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 32% | 6% | |
| 24 | CHRISTY Peter C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 38% | 6% |
| 25 | RACHTCHININE Alexandre | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% |
| 26 | PEI Suyang | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 27 | HITCHCOCK David | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 23% | 3% |
| 28 | GROSSE Michael | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 43% | 15% | 2% |
| 29 | KMIEC Stephen M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 10% |
| 30 | NEWSOME James L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
| 31 | PERKA Michael | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 27% | 1% | |
| 32 | SWANSON Dave | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 33 | HALLMAN Nicholas (Nick) J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 16% |
| 34 | LIOU Solomon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 10% |
| 35 | CARTER Austin L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 43% | 12% |
| 36 | KROGH Dan Krogh (Dan) M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 30% | 6% |
| 37 | COX Matthew T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% |
| 38 | KIM Jeff | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 14% | 1% |
| 39 | PRIHODKO Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 14% |
| 40 | HABIB Farooq | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% |
| 41 | HUNTER Justin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 17% | |
| 42 | YAKIMENKO Andrei | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 9% |
| 43 | WHEELER Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% |
| 44 | ZUCKER Noah L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 26% |
| 45 | MARSH Timothy G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 6% |
| 46 | LOCASALE Nicholas A. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 50% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 46 | LAWLOR Lee | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 26% | 4% | - |
| 48 | KENT Dwain | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 9% |
| 49 | OZANNE Jeffrey S. | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 49 | CHU Brandon A. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 65% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
| 51 | CLAWSON Brian C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 30% | 2% |
| 52 | KOKENGE Chad | 100% | 86% | 48% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 53 | MEGGERS Samuel | 100% | 86% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 54 | LOEFFLER Carl E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 15% |
| 55 | RODACHY Jeffrey M. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 56 | BLAT Robert | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% | 30% | 6% | 1% |
| 57 | JOYCE David | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
| 58 | DEPOMMIER Remi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 32% | 2% |
| 59 | SANTOS Felipe | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 60 | HARRIS Robert S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 17% | 2% |
| 61 | KING Richard (Dick) M. | 100% | 72% | 29% | 5% | - | - | |
| 62 | MARINI Davide | 100% | 81% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 63 | BAXTER David | 100% | 98% | 80% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 64 | BARTLETT Jonathan R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 49% | 14% |
| 65 | BRUS Brian V. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
| 66 | ALTMAN Jeff H. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
| 67 | HUGHES Michael D. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 68 | MORET Eric N. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 68 | CHOI Paul S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 14% | 1% |
| 70 | WILSON Jeffrey M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 9% |
| 71 | KRYLTSOV Greg | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 12% | - | |
| 72 | FREY Wayne N. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 73 | CAMPBELL Paul | 100% | 77% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 74 | MARKOWITZ William M. | 100% | 88% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 75 | WINKLER Michael | 100% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 76 | O'DOWD Andrew J. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 25% | 4% | |
| 77 | EVANS Allen L. | 100% | 87% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 78 | COLE Matthew | 100% | 81% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 79 | LIPTON Michael D. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 80 | KLINE R. Jay | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 81 | KREMPASKY John H. | 100% | 93% | 59% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 82 | KASKAN Peter E. | 100% | 99% | 77% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 83 | SIMMONS Matthew C. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 83 | WILLIAMS Charles | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 85 | DAVIS Kelly | 100% | 88% | 42% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 86 | LINGVAY Laurance (Larry) S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
| 87 | EVERT Todd | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 88 | MOLLINIER TOUBLET Bertrand | 100% | 67% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 89 | NEMAZIE David A. | 100% | 100% | 90% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 90 | WU Robert | 100% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 91 | REED David | 100% | 86% | 53% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 92 | NEALE James H. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 34% | 6% | - |
| 93 | GAO "George" Xiaojiang | 100% | 57% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 94 | DENYSSEVYCH Ivan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 80% | 50% | 20% | 3% |
| 95 | DELONG Mike | 100% | 95% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 96 | BECK Brian C. | 100% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 97 | WALTING Paul J. | 100% | 95% | 75% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 98 | TKACH Robert W. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 98 | LEE Wei-Sheng | 100% | 54% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 100 | ARMSTRONG Payton | 100% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 101 | SIMS Martin L. | 100% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 102 | MIZRAHI Meir | 100% | 62% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 103 | ERTEL Mark C. | 100% | 51% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 103 | PIERRO Roger | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 105 | RIFKIND Neil | 100% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 106 | STAFURIK John (Jack) W. | 100% | 79% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 106 | MCNALLY Thomas J. | 100% | 96% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 108 | KERTESZ Stefan G. | 100% | 91% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 109 | KUHN Jeffrey | 100% | 76% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 110 | DOWNEY Gerard C. | 100% | 85% | 46% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 111 | VALENTINE Shem | 100% | 85% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 112 | WHITELOCK James R. | 100% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 113 | NUDELMAN Aleksandr | 100% | 98% | 81% | 42% | 11% | 1% | |
| 114 | BOYKO Frank C. | 100% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 114 | ALEKSEEV Konstantin | 100% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 116 | ROGERS John D. | 100% | 47% | 8% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.