Prime Fencing Academy - Dublin, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | PARK Jackson | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 16% | < 1% |
| 2 | GUAN Angie | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
| 3 | CHOI Audrey M | 17% | 41% | 33% | 9% | - | - |
| 3 | AN Smiley | 34% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 5 | KANG Kayla | - | - | 4% | 32% | 46% | 18% |
| 6 | PARK Cora | 38% | 46% | 14% | 2% | < 1% | - |
| 7 | LIM Hanson | - | - | - | 2% | 24% | 74% |
| 8 | SARAVANAN Swathi | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 13% |
| 9 | RAI Anaika | 52% | 39% | 8% | 1% | < 1% | |
| 10 | SAMER LAKHANI Aamena | - | 7% | 35% | 43% | 15% | |
| 11 | GOOLLA Rishab | 2% | 20% | 44% | 29% | 4% | |
| 12 | LAI Cambria | 8% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 13 | SAI DEVANATH Vishwajith | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 41% | 10% |
| 14 | CAI Yihang | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 15 | CHOHAN Aneel | 7% | 30% | 40% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 16 | LEW Benjamin | - | 5% | 23% | 43% | 28% | 1% |
| 17 | BHOOMIREDDY Meera | - | 7% | 55% | 31% | 6% | - |
| 18 | KOMALA Pari Missing ID | ||||||
| 19 | VONTIMITTA Kiara | 26% | 48% | 23% | 3% | - | - |
| 20 | DULGUUN Itgel (SAM) | 1% | 18% | 40% | 32% | 9% | |
| 21 | CHEN Mason | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 12% | |
| 22 | VONTIMITTA Neel | 5% | 30% | 41% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 23 | MA Iris | < 1% | 3% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 8% |
| 24 | SAMER LAKHANI Zahra | < 1% | 2% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.