Prime Fencing Academy - Dublin, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | PARK Jackson | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 17% | < 1% |
| 2 | GUAN Angie | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 6% |
| 3 | CHOI Audrey M | 100% | 83% | 42% | 9% | - | - |
| 3 | AN Smiley | 100% | 66% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 5 | KANG Kayla | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 64% | 18% |
| 6 | PARK Cora | 100% | 62% | 16% | 2% | < 1% | - |
| 7 | LIM Hanson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 74% |
| 8 | SARAVANAN Swathi | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 13% |
| 9 | RAI Anaika | 100% | 48% | 9% | 1% | < 1% | |
| 10 | SAMER LAKHANI Aamena | 100% | 100% | 93% | 58% | 15% | |
| 11 | GOOLLA Rishab | 100% | 98% | 78% | 33% | 4% | |
| 12 | LAI Cambria | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 13 | SAI DEVANATH Vishwajith | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 51% | 10% |
| 14 | CAI Yihang | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 15 | CHOHAN Aneel | 100% | 93% | 64% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 16 | LEW Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 30% | 1% |
| 17 | BHOOMIREDDY Meera | 100% | 100% | 93% | 37% | 6% | - |
| 18 | KOMALA Pari Missing ID | ||||||
| 19 | VONTIMITTA Kiara | 100% | 74% | 26% | 3% | - | - |
| 20 | DULGUUN Itgel (SAM) | 100% | 99% | 81% | 41% | 9% | |
| 21 | CHEN Mason | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 12% | |
| 22 | VONTIMITTA Neel | 100% | 95% | 65% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 23 | MA Iris | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 8% |
| 24 | SAMER LAKHANI Zahra | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.