Nashville, TN - Nashville, TN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | RHYU Kozmo | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% |
2 | KIM Ethan J. | - | - | 6% | 27% | 48% | 19% | |
3 | ROBINSON Keegan B. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 42% | 43% | |
3 | YIM Nathan H. | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% | |
5 | STEELE DeMario A. | - | - | - | 7% | 36% | 57% | |
6 | WALKER IV Weymouth D. | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 42% | 25% | |
7 | CAPELLUA Tommaso | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 41% | 9% | |
8 | KOUSTIKOV Max | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% | |
9 | GATZA Logan | - | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 41% | 17% |
10 | PARK Jong-Eun | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
11 | BUYANOV Nikita V. | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 7% | |
12 | JACKSON James | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
13 | JOSEPH William | 2% | 18% | 41% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
14 | VALES Keyan | 2% | 14% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 5% | 1% |
15 | PARNAS Apollo | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% | |
16 | WU Byron | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
17 | KIM Alexander | - | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 36% | 17% |
18 | ARANA Abraham | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
19 | SCHARF Ryan | 6% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
20 | CANTRELL Jason T. | 1% | 12% | 35% | 37% | 13% | 1% | |
21 | PARNAS Ely | - | 4% | 24% | 44% | 25% | 3% | |
22 | CHAWLA Armaan | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 11% | |
23 | WEIST Spencer | 43% | 40% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
24 | CLICK Aiden | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
25 | FORSYTHE Hunter | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
26 | JORDAN Jonathan ". | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 4% |
27 | JAAFAR Omar | 3% | 21% | 43% | 27% | 6% | - | |
28 | JANG Elliot | - | 9% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 3% | |
28 | LEE Kennith | 9% | 43% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - | |
30 | CHONG christopher | - | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
31 | MARIN Lucas | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - |
32 | LIU Edward | 8% | 38% | 39% | 14% | 1% | - | |
33 | NORMAN Christian | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
34 | ZHANG Andy | 46% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
35 | JAAFAR Youssef | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
36 | HULSEY Logan | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
37 | BAKER Julian L. | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
38 | KURBEGOV Alexander R. | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 5% | - | |
39 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
40 | FERNANDEZ Christopher | 57% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
41 | NICHOLS JR Cortez | 6% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
42 | SHAH Anuj | 18% | 46% | 29% | 6% | - | - | |
43 | SONG Ervin | 24% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
44 | WERNER Sean T. | 67% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | |
45 | WANG Aidan | 31% | 43% | 21% | 5% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.