Nashville, TN - Nashville, TN, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | RHYU Kozmo | V V V V V D | V V V V V | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 2 | KIM Ethan J. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 3 | ROBINSON Keegan B. | V D D V V | V V V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
| 3 | YIM Nathan H. | D V V V V | V V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 5 | STEELE DeMario A. | V V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 6 | WALKER IV Weymouth D. | V V V V D | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 7 | CAPELLUA Tommaso | D V V D V | V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 8 | KOUSTIKOV Max | V V V D D | V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 9 | GATZA Logan | V V V V V V | V D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
| 10 | PARK Jong-Eun | V V V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
| 11 | BUYANOV Nikita V. | D V V V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 12 | JACKSON James | V D V V V | V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 13 | JOSEPH William | V V V D D | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 14 | VALES Keyan | D V V D D V | V V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 15 | PARNAS Apollo | V D D D V | V V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 16 | WU Byron | D D D V D V | V V D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
| 17 | KIM Alexander | V V V V V V | D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
| 18 | ARANA Abraham | V V V V V D | D | 2.5 | 5 | +2.5 |
| 19 | SCHARF Ryan | V V V D D V | D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
| 20 | CANTRELL Jason T. | D V D V V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 21 | PARNAS Ely | D V V V D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 22 | CHAWLA Armaan | V V D D V | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 23 | WEIST Spencer | V D D V V D | V D | 0.8 | 3 | +2.2 |
| 24 | CLICK Aiden | V V D D V D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 25 | FORSYTHE Hunter | D V V D V D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 26 | JORDAN Jonathan ". | V V D V D D | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 27 | JAAFAR Omar | V D D D V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 28 | JANG Elliot | D D D V V | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 28 | LEE Kennith | V D V D D | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 30 | CHONG christopher | D D V D D V | V D | 4.4 | 2 | -2.4 |
| 31 | MARIN Lucas | D D V D V D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 32 | LIU Edward | D D D D D | V D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 33 | NORMAN Christian | D D V D V V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 34 | ZHANG Andy | V D D V D | D | 0.7 | 2 | +1.3 |
| 35 | JAAFAR Youssef | D D D V V D | D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 36 | HULSEY Logan | V D D D D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 37 | BAKER Julian L. | V D D D V D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 38 | KURBEGOV Alexander R. | D V D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 39 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | D D D V D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 40 | FERNANDEZ Christopher | D D V D D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 41 | NICHOLS JR Cortez | D D D V D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 42 | SHAH Anuj | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 43 | SONG Ervin | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 44 | WERNER Sean T. | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 45 | WANG Aidan | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.