Cincinnati, OH - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HUDSON Jeffrey (Jeff) A. | - | 3% | 19% | 41% | 31% | 6% | |
| 2 | STEWART Robert | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
| 3 | SNIDER Jeffrey H. | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 3 | MEHALL Michael | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 5 | HITCHCOCK David | - | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 35% | 11% |
| 6 | JOHNSON Jeff | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
| 7 | WILKINSON Derek H. | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% |
| 8 | PHO Eric | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 9 | BARTLETT Jonathan R. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 12% |
| 10 | WALLACE Patric | - | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 34% | 12% |
| 11 | NEALE James H. | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 9% |
| 12 | BEIHOLD James (Jim) K. | 4% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 13 | JENSEN David | 4% | 18% | 31% | 28% | 14% | 4% | - |
| 14 | WALKER William H. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% | |
| 15 | DIDASKALOU Ilias L. | - | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 16 | KLINE R. Jay | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 17 | SKOPIK Jr August | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
| 18 | POULIQUEN Benoit (Ben) | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
| 19 | SCOTT George R. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 5% |
| 20 | GERACI Paul A. | - | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 21 | FOLEY Kevin | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 19% | |
| 22 | MAZZOLI Julio C. | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
| 23 | MARSH Timothy G. | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 6% | |
| 24 | BARREIRO Darren | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 25 | FRANK Fred | - | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 6% |
| 26 | VARNEY John R. | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 27 | ABELE Chris | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 25% | 7% |
| 28 | JOHNSON David L. | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 29 | PERKA Michael | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 6% |
| 30 | TOOMEY Brian L. | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 31 | SANTOS Felipe | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 32 | SUVEG Bela | - | 5% | 20% | 38% | 31% | 7% | |
| 33 | DEUCHER Joseph H. | - | - | 1% | 12% | 35% | 38% | 14% |
| 34 | RESHEIDAT Shadi | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% |
| 35 | DOWNEY Gerard C. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 31% |
| 36 | SPAHN Jeff | - | 3% | 20% | 42% | 29% | 6% | |
| 37 | BAXTER Daniel J. | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | |
| 38 | LEE Tobias (Toby) T. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 39 | LOGAN Mark P. | 1% | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 40 | SWANSON Dave | 2% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 41 | BLANCHARD Aaron (Sam) S. | - | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 42 | HARRIS Robert S. | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 11% | |
| 43 | GAUVEY Ken C. | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 43 | ALLEN Graham | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 2% |
| 45 | YAO Shun | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
| 46 | PARY Theodore | - | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 47 | SUMLER Jeffery | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 22% |
| 48 | EVANS Allen L. | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 49 | MILLS Tim A. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% |
| 49 | CULLER Michael (Mike) D. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 51 | SAYLOR David A. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 32% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 52 | BRONZO Thomas E. | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 53 | DESAMOURS Georges H. | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 10% |
| 54 | DAMIANI Paolo | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 55 | DICKSON Tim | - | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 56 | KRUGER Mark (Mark Kruger) | 5% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 57 | NEMAZIE David A. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 57 | BRUCE II Ommer E. | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 59 | OCHS Bradley C. | 1% | 7% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 12% | 2% |
| 60 | ROUSE Joseph (Joe) T. | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 61 | CASTELLANOS Rene E. | 29% | 42% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 62 | SWANN William A. | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 63 | PAPADOPOULOS Nic | - | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 64 | SIMMONS Matthew C. | - | 6% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 6% | |
| 65 | PEISTRUP Gregory (Greg) L. | 3% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 5% | - |
| 66 | DUFFY Gerald | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 1% | |
| 67 | LEONARDINI Barry M. | 26% | 47% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 68 | KAIN Brad | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 69 | SILVANIA Michael | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 70 | FANGMAN Daniel L. | 1% | 12% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 70 | ANDERSON Michael L. | 11% | 37% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 72 | MARSHALL William L. | 5% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 73 | KING Charles M. | 6% | 23% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 74 | TIERNEY Luke | 13% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 75 | RITCHIE Mark T. | 3% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
| 76 | TKACH Robert W. | 1% | 24% | 43% | 25% | 6% | - | |
| 77 | SCHROEDER William | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 78 | KIM Brad K. | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 79 | BARAFF David | 9% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 80 | PARTE Aidan | 47% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 81 | VAN GOLEN Kenneth L. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 82 | GERSEN Jacob | 36% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 83 | KATOPES Peter | 4% | 19% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 84 | BERMENDER Eric | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 85 | RIFKIND Neil | 5% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 86 | LIPTON Michael D. | 9% | 29% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 87 | GILLESPIE Jeremy W. | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 88 | BRADFORD Wayne D. | 9% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 89 | GRAVIS Martin V. | 12% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 90 | HVIDING Ketil | 10% | 40% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 90 | MEHALL Michael | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 92 | KRICK Jon | 9% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
| 93 | SATTERWHITE William W. | 13% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 94 | POMPIAN Mark | 11% | 36% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 95 | WINTERSHEIMER Blaise Q. | 7% | 46% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.