Pasadena, CA - Pasadena, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ROBINSON Riley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% | |
| 2 | MEINHOLD Li | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 32% | |
| 3 | LEE Aaron Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% | |
| 3 | EMARA Omar | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 16% | 2% | |
| 5 | MILAM Hugh | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 50% |
| 6 | WANG Nathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 28% | |
| 7 | SINGHA Orion | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 11% | |
| 8 | KULIGOWSKI Bartosz | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 17% | |
| 9 | ZHU Max | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 5% |
| 10 | JIN daniel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 3% |
| 11 | LIN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 45% | |
| 12 | SHUR Yakov C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 12% | |
| 13 | SIVAGAR Leo | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% | |
| 14 | JIN Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 11% |
| 15 | WEAVER Neil | 100% | 100% | 90% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 16 | AHN Gus | 100% | 98% | 80% | 43% | 11% | 1% | |
| 17 | MOSES Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 25% |
| 18 | DAO Matthew M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 37% |
| 19 | SCHENCK Theo | 100% | 99% | 85% | 47% | 12% | 1% | |
| 20 | ROMERO Caleb E. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
| 21 | WELLS Tommy R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 63% | 23% |
| 22 | MAENG Jake W. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 4% |
| 23 | GRAYSON Shane W. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 15% | 2% | |
| 24 | LIANG Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 12% |
| 25 | CHU Anthony | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 26 | ZHOU Stanley Q. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 27 | REDDINGTON aidan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 2% |
| 28 | LEE Matthew C. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 62% | 24% | 3% | |
| 29 | SHOURIE Jai | 100% | 98% | 80% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
| 30 | GILLISON Edward L. | 100% | 99% | 85% | 46% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 31 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 4% | |
| 32 | KOPPE Benjamin | 100% | 53% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 33 | ZHOU Alec Q. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 4% | |
| 34 | KOSLU Aidan D. | 100% | 97% | 75% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
| 35 | MOHEBI Saam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 28% | 4% |
| 36 | DEKERMANJI Christopher | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 29% | |
| 37 | ALFARO Justus | 100% | 99% | 82% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
| 38 | FOREMAN Alexander E. | 100% | 98% | 77% | 35% | 7% | - | |
| 39 | KIM Sterling S. | 100% | 95% | 69% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 40 | COMER Alexander J. | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 41 | MATTIS George | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 42 | NA Larry | 100% | 93% | 69% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 43 | LI Henry | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 7% | |
| 44 | MENDOZA Zachari | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 20% | |
| 45 | THOMPSON Chester | 100% | 96% | 70% | 31% | 6% | - | |
| 46 | SOOHOO Jackson F. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 47 | WONG Nathan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 48 | CHARLES Matthew J. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 49 | SMITH Zane A. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 50 | KOPPE Alexander | 100% | 98% | 73% | 33% | 7% | 1% | |
| 51 | SPEICHER Brian E. | 100% | 97% | 71% | 28% | 5% | - | |
| 52 | DALVA Michael | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 53 | FEES HOLDEN | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% | |
| 54 | MUIR Douglas K. | 100% | 63% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 55 | CROSSMAN Brandon | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 56 | NGO Ethan | 100% | 85% | 47% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 57 | AUTELLI Marco | 100% | 96% | 63% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 58 | ORTEGA Julien | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 59 | ESTRADA Luke | 100% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 60 | BERSHIN Izzy | 100% | 94% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 61 | GUPTA-GARCIA Krish | 100% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 62 | KIM Darius H. | 100% | 90% | 57% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 63 | ONTIVEROS Miller | 100% | 21% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 64 | GUPTA-GARCIA Raj | 100% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.