Chatsworth, CA - Chatsworth, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | OH Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 32% | |
2 | PAZ Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% |
3 | BURKE Spencer W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 55% | |
3 | LUH Ethan K. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 40% | 7% | |
5 | GODZHIK Zachary | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 52% | 11% | |
6 | MORALES Ian N. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 36% | 6% | |
7 | DANKAR Neel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 18% | |
8 | JORDON Kaleb W. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 4% | |
9 | LEE David Y. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 1% |
10 | JAIN Aditya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 17% | |
11 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
12 | LIN Dashiell | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% | |
13 | GOLDADE Luke A. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 5% | |
14 | XIAO EDWARD | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% | |
15 | GOBBO Alexander | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 19% | 2% |
16 | RYOU Aiden | 100% | 90% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - | |
17 | ZHOU Oscar J. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% | 16% | 2% | |
18 | WU Jerry Z. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 10% | |
19 | YAKUSHKIN Ernest D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% | |
20 | AVRON Case B. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% | |
21 | LI Ryan Z. | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
22 | WOMACH Tristan | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 6% | - | |
23 | BAEK David | 100% | 100% | 92% | 65% | 26% | 4% | |
24 | PIESNER Joshua C. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 10% | |
25 | KIM Derek A. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% | |
26 | DETERING Julian | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 15% | 1% | |
27 | KIM Banseok | 100% | 98% | 80% | 42% | 11% | 1% | |
28 | MUSHER Benjamin J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 10% | |
29 | REDDINGTON aidan | 100% | 96% | 68% | 25% | 4% | - | |
30 | WONG Luke S. | 100% | 95% | 70% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
31 | NAM Michael | 100% | 79% | 29% | 5% | - | - | |
32 | LI Avery Peihong | 100% | 97% | 72% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
33 | MA Jonas(zhao long) | 100% | 84% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | |
34 | HUANG Kevin D. | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | |
35 | HARRIS Rhonen | 100% | 65% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
36 | LLIDO Soren | 100% | 97% | 68% | 25% | 4% | - | |
37 | TANG Adrian | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
38 | OH Jaden | 100% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | |
39 | JI Evan | 100% | 97% | 78% | 38% | 8% | 1% | |
40 | MU Jeffrey | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
41 | QIU Jay (Tengjie) | 100% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | |
42 | BERSHIN Izzy | 100% | 48% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
43 | NERSISYAN Raphael | 100% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.