La Jolla, CA - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MATVEEV Valentin S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 22% | |
| 2 | LEVY Zachari I. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 21% | |
| 3 | LEE Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 90% | 57% | 17% | |
| 3 | ZHANG Eric | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
| 5 | CHIEN Brandon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% | 29% | |
| 6 | DINGMAN Spencer | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 56% | 9% | |
| 7 | SODERBERG Alex Z. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 29% |
| 8 | WEI Zikun | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 16% | |
| 9 | PROCTOR Oliver L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 23% | |
| 10 | CANDELA Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 70% | |
| 11 | NG Alexander M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 13% | 1% |
| 12 | LEE Michael | 100% | 99% | 86% | 50% | 14% | 2% | |
| 13 | WANG Nathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 50% | 13% | |
| 14 | MAENG Jake W. | 100% | 99% | 79% | 38% | 9% | 1% | |
| 15 | NORBUTAS Jackson S. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 26% | 2% | |
| 16 | SCHENCK Theo | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 17 | MILAM Hugh | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 16% | |
| 18 | PHEN Justin P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 27% |
| 19 | COMER Daniel T. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 20 | ZHOU Alan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 8% | |
| 21 | YUMIACO Nolan C. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 59% | 20% | 2% | |
| 22 | ZHU Wilson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 27% | |
| 23 | LEE Aaron Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 59% | 19% |
| 24 | SHACKLEFORD Aidan J. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 25 | MOORE Thomas J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 13% |
| 26 | FEES HOLDEN | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 8% | |
| 27 | LIN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% | |
| 28 | BHARATHI Bhrugu S. | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 29 | MOHEBI Saam | 100% | 88% | 51% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 30 | GARRISON Cameron | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 8% | 1% | |
| 31 | SHOURIE Jai | 100% | 86% | 42% | 7% | - | - | |
| 32 | VELO Juan Manuel H. | 100% | 91% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 33 | LEE Alexander G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 47% | 10% | |
| 34 | OGILVIE Evan C. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 59% | 20% | 3% | |
| 35 | LIANG Aaron | 100% | 97% | 77% | 34% | 7% | 1% | |
| 36 | KIM Sterling S. | 100% | 100% | 88% | 33% | 4% | - | |
| 37 | LILLIAN Francis (Alex) (Alex) A. | 100% | 41% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 38 | KOSLU Aidan D. | 100% | 89% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 39 | EASTMAN Blake C. | 100% | 83% | 32% | 5% | - | - | |
| 40 | WELLS Tommy R. | 100% | 90% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 41 | MATTIS George | 100% | 98% | 78% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
| 42 | POCSVEILER Magor | 100% | 64% | 20% | 2% | - | - | |
| 43 | GILLISON Edward L. | 100% | 89% | 51% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 44 | HARRIS Roark S. | 100% | 89% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 45 | SPEICHER Brian E. | 100% | 85% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | SCRIBNER Aidan C. | 100% | 78% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | ZHU Max | 100% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 48 | COMER Alexander J. | 100% | 56% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 49 | BORLAND Isaac | 100% | 35% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 50 | ESTRADA Luke | 100% | 29% | 3% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.