Chatsworth, CA - Chatsworth, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | NAYGAS LAWRENCE I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 42% |
| 2 | KANG Anthony Jaegu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 19% |
| 3 | SADOVSKY Leor B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 46% | 12% |
| 3 | WONG Antonio | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 15% | |
| 5 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 35% |
| 6 | DE LA FUENTE Ian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
| 7 | KIM Ryan Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 11% | |
| 8 | LLIDO Soren | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 9 | FUKUDA Diego | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 14% |
| 10 | KIM Aiden | 100% | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 11 | SHEN Owen | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 30% | 4% | |
| 12 | OH Jaden | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 13 | RYOU Andy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 30% | 6% |
| 14 | BAUER Roman | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 15 | RASMUSSEN Sage | 100% | 98% | 85% | 57% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 16 | LO Preston | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 17 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 61% | |
| 18 | WU James | 100% | 85% | 40% | 8% | < 1% | - | |
| 19 | NORIEGA Julian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 5% |
| 20 | DINSAY Kristjan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 4% |
| 21 | LEE Dylan | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 22 | WANG Logan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% |
| 23 | KHVANG Sebastien T. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 24 | CHOI Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 45% | |
| 25 | NGUYEN martin | 100% | 92% | 62% | 22% | 3% | - | |
| 26 | AGRAWAL Niki | 100% | 86% | 48% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 27 | SHEN Oliver | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 28 | KIM Luke | 100% | 85% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 29 | YI William | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 18% | 2% | |
| 30 | ULLOA Trent J. | 100% | 78% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | PARK Gabriel | 100% | 99% | 74% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 32 | LIEW Harrison C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
| 33 | TSAO Holden | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 34 | ASHJIAN Nicolas | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 35 | PARK Sangmin (Steve) | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 36 | TULYAG Azim | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 36 | PARK Sky | 100% | 66% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 38 | EDISON Ansel | 100% | 72% | 29% | 6% | - | - | |
| 39 | JEONG Taewoo | 100% | 50% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 40 | GOLWALA Yash | 100% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.