Chatsworth, CA - Chatsworth, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | SHIFRON Daniel A. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 2 | SINGHA Orion | V V V V V D | V V V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 3 | NORBUTAS Jackson S. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 3 | WANG Nathan | D V V V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 5 | MOHEBI Saam | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 6 | CHUNG Thomas | V V D V V D | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 7 | LIN Ryan | V D V D D V | V V D | 5.1 | 3 | -2.1 |
| 8 | GILLISON Edward L. | D V D D V V | V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 9 | WEAVER Neil | V V V V V V | V D | 3.4 | 6 | +2.6 |
| 10 | LIANG Aaron | V V V V V D | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 11 | PARK Elliot | D V D V V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 12 | DEKERMANJI Christopher | V V V D D V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 13 | SOOHOO Jackson F. | D V D V D V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 14 | MENDOZA Zachari | V V V D D D | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 15 | ZHOU Stanley Q. | D D D V V V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 16 | KUO Elvin | D D V V D D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 17 | THOMPSON Chester | V V V D V D | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 18 | WONG Nathan | D V V D D V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 19 | KIM Darius H. | V V D D D V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 20 | CROSSMAN Brandon | D D D V V V | D | 0.9 | 3 | +2.1 |
| 21 | COMER Alexander J. | V D V D D V | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 21 | SCHENCK Theo | V D D V V D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 23 | FEES HOLDEN | D V D D D V | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 23 | FOREMAN Alexander E. | V D D D V D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 25 | JIN daniel | D D D V V D | D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 26 | KIM Sterling S. | D D V D D V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 27 | WITT Zachary | D V D V D D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 28 | BERSHIN Izzy | D V D V D D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 29 | WOMACH Tristan | V D D V D D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 30 | SHOURIE Jai | D V D D D D | V D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
| 31 | PHUKAN Rohin | D D D D V D | V D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 32 | MUIR Douglas K. | D D V D D D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 33 | ZHUANG William | D D D D D V | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 34 | ONTIVEROS Miller | D D V D D D | D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
| 35 | KOPPE Alexander | D D D D D D | D | 2.8 | 0 | -2.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.