Chatsworth, CA - Chatsworth, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | BURKE Spencer W. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
2 | OH Jonathan | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
3 | GODZHIK Zachary | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
3 | GOBBO Alexander | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
5 | DANKAR Neel | V V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
6 | LUH Ethan K. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
7 | JAIN Aditya | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
8 | LI Ryan Z. | V V V V D V | V V V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
9 | YAKUSHKIN Ernest D. | V V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
10 | RYOU Aiden | V V V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
11 | WU Jerry Z. | D V V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
12 | DETERING Julian | V D V D V V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
13 | BAEK David | V V D V D V | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
14 | KANG Anthony Jaegu | D V V V D V | V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
15 | LI Avery Peihong | D V V V D | V V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
16 | NAYGAS LAWRENCE I. | D D V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
17 | KIM Derek A. | V V V V D | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
18 | KIM Ryan Y. | V V D V V | V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
19 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | V V V V D | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
20 | NAM Michael | V V D V V D | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
21 | LE Jacob W. | V D D V V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
22 | ZHOU Oscar J. | V D D V V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
23 | MUSHER Benjamin J. | D V D V V | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
24 | TAN Peter | D V D V V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
25 | OH Jaden | V V D D V D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
26 | LAKE Wyatt J. | D D V V D V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
27 | BAUER Roman | D V D D V V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
28 | SIU Aiden | D D V D V | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
29 | WONG Luke S. | D D V V D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
30 | CANLAS Nathan | D D D V V | V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
31 | PARK Gabriel | D V D V D | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
32 | LLIDO Soren | D V V D D D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
33 | KHVANG Sebastien T. | V V V D D | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
34 | LEE Dylan | V D D D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
35 | ZHENG Zhe | V D D D V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
36 | WONG Antonio | D V V D D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 | |
37 | KIM Aiden | V D V D D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
38 | SUEDA Connor | V D D D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
39 | BRENNAN Ty | V V D D D | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
40 | SHEN Owen | D D V D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
41 | UHM RYAN | V V D D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
42 | FRCEK Armand A. | D D V D V D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
43 | ULLOA Trent J. | D V D D D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
44 | JI Evan | D D D D V | D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
45 | HUANG Kevin D. | D D V D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
46 | QIU Jay (Tengjie) | D V D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
47 | RAINS Jackson T. | D D D V D | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
48 | CHU Colin | V D D D D | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
49 | KHODYAKOV Nikolai | D D D V D D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
50 | RYOU Andy | D D D V D D | D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
51 | DE LA FUENTE Ian | D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
52 | AGRAWAL Niki | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
53 | PARK Sky | D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
54 | GRAPHIA Gabriel | D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
54 | SANCHEZ William | D D D D D | D | 2.4 | 0 | -2.4 |
56 | WU James | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
56 | EDISON Ansel | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.