Chatsworth, CA - Chatsworth, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | BURKE Spencer W. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 72% |
2 | OH Jonathan | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 48% |
3 | GODZHIK Zachary | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 32% |
3 | GOBBO Alexander | - | - | 4% | 24% | 45% | 26% | |
5 | DANKAR Neel | - | - | 6% | 24% | 44% | 26% | |
6 | LUH Ethan K. | - | - | 4% | 23% | 48% | 24% | |
7 | JAIN Aditya | - | - | - | 7% | 39% | 53% | |
8 | LI Ryan Z. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
9 | YAKUSHKIN Ernest D. | - | - | 1% | 12% | 40% | 47% | |
10 | RYOU Aiden | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% | |
11 | WU Jerry Z. | - | 3% | 18% | 41% | 32% | 7% | |
12 | DETERING Julian | - | - | 2% | 17% | 43% | 32% | 6% |
13 | BAEK David | - | - | 4% | 19% | 40% | 32% | 4% |
14 | KANG Anthony Jaegu | - | - | 1% | 12% | 38% | 39% | 10% |
15 | LI Avery Peihong | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | |
16 | NAYGAS LAWRENCE I. | - | - | 4% | 25% | 51% | 20% | |
17 | KIM Derek A. | - | 8% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 3% | |
18 | KIM Ryan Y. | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% | |
19 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | - | - | 5% | 26% | 45% | 24% | |
20 | NAM Michael | - | 2% | 18% | 43% | 29% | 7% | - |
21 | LE Jacob W. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
22 | ZHOU Oscar J. | - | 3% | 18% | 40% | 32% | 7% | |
23 | MUSHER Benjamin J. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 45% | 39% | |
24 | TAN Peter | - | 4% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 8% | - |
25 | OH Jaden | 1% | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 2% | - |
26 | LAKE Wyatt J. | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 12% | 1% |
27 | BAUER Roman | 5% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
28 | SIU Aiden | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 34% | 8% | |
29 | WONG Luke S. | 1% | 14% | 42% | 34% | 8% | - | |
30 | CANLAS Nathan | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 17% | |
31 | PARK Gabriel | 7% | 45% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
32 | LLIDO Soren | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
33 | KHVANG Sebastien T. | 4% | 28% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | |
34 | LEE Dylan | 4% | 29% | 43% | 21% | 3% | - | |
35 | ZHENG Zhe | - | 8% | 36% | 43% | 12% | 1% | |
36 | WONG Antonio | 2% | 18% | 42% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
37 | KIM Aiden | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | |
38 | SUEDA Connor | 2% | 24% | 46% | 23% | 4% | - | |
39 | BRENNAN Ty | 33% | 46% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
40 | SHEN Owen | 3% | 30% | 42% | 21% | 4% | - | |
41 | UHM RYAN | 1% | 12% | 35% | 36% | 14% | 2% | |
42 | FRCEK Armand A. | 13% | 43% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
43 | ULLOA Trent J. | 7% | 38% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
44 | JI Evan | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% | |
45 | HUANG Kevin D. | 1% | 10% | 34% | 40% | 14% | 1% | |
46 | QIU Jay (Tengjie) | 34% | 51% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
47 | RAINS Jackson T. | 65% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | |
48 | CHU Colin | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | |
49 | KHODYAKOV Nikolai | 60% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
50 | RYOU Andy | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
51 | DE LA FUENTE Ian | 6% | 40% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | |
52 | AGRAWAL Niki | 36% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
53 | PARK Sky | 81% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | |
54 | GRAPHIA Gabriel | 73% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | |
54 | SANCHEZ William | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
56 | WU James | 6% | 38% | 41% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
56 | EDISON Ansel | 55% | 37% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.