Manalapan, NJ - Manalapan, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 21% |
| 2 | JOSEPH Willem | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
| 3 | GOGUEN-COMPAGNONI Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% | |
| 3 | BUERGIN Aidan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% |
| 5 | JAUME Andrei | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 15% |
| 6 | LI Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 31% | |
| 7 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% |
| 8 | SANTULLI Tristan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 9 | AHN Jun | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 11% | |
| 10 | SELL Ethan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 7% |
| 11 | SZEGO Bence P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 43% | 11% |
| 12 | BELLUOMO David C. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 2% |
| 13 | MULLIGAN Timothy (Tim) D. | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
| 14 | GARR James D. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 12% | 1% | |
| 15 | DAUM Charlie | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 39% | 13% | 2% |
| 16 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 17 | KEE Andrew L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% |
| 18 | FU Yifan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
| 19 | DEEB Adam | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 20 | PAULSON Connor M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 37% | 7% | |
| 21 | CAPUTO Paul M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 13% |
| 22 | SELENDY Maximilian (Max) A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 8% |
| 23 | HAN Lawrence | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
| 24 | CAI Oliver K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 9% |
| 25 | LIU Eric Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 91% | 63% | 26% | 5% |
| 26 | HORSLEY Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 27% | |
| 27 | DALBERG Leif | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 8% | |
| 28 | CHOI-SLATTERY Kieran M. | 100% | 74% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 29 | WERWA Griffith | 100% | 84% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 30 | VAZQUEZ Sebastian A. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 31 | MENG Zhaoyi | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
| 32 | KLEIN Sebastian W. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
| 33 | NITTEL Jake | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 34 | YU Jonathan J. | 100% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 35 | PAE Brian L. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 5% | |
| 36 | WANG Alex L. | 100% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 37 | HEINRICH Alexander J. | 100% | 96% | 78% | 47% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 38 | EIG Ethan A. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 39 | GUPTA Varun | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
| 40 | JUSTUS Benjamin | 100% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 41 | RADTKE Jakob | 100% | 81% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 42 | GISLER Benjamin B. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
| 43 | XIE Javah | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 8% | |
| 44 | ECK Nathaniel | 100% | 91% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 45 | MAYER Richard | 100% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 45 | BROWN Alexander R. | 100% | 72% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 47 | ARANA Massimo | 100% | 88% | 48% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 48 | MCLAUGHLIN Ryan | 100% | 83% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 49 | CANO Renzo | 100% | 90% | 58% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 50 | XU Mathu Yang | 100% | 56% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 51 | SZE Timothy | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | SZE Benjamin | 100% | 31% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 53 | TOMASCO Gavin | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.