Rocky Point, NY - Rocky Point, NY, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | INSLER Gabriel C. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
| 2 | PAVLENISHVILI David G. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 3 | LEIGH David A. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 3 | KIM Juni C. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 5 | SUICO Zachary Emanuel O. | V V V V D V | V V D | 2.4 | 5 | +2.6 |
| 6 | SLAVINSKIY Alan | V D V V V | V V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 7 | DISIMONE David Z. | V D V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 8 | KANG Michael H. | V D V V D | V V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 9 | BEKKER Mitchel | V V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 10 | LUKANYUK Lorence | V V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 11 | SHENG Patrick Y. | V V D V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 12 | GIBSON Nowell L. | V V V V D | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 13 | INSLER Ethan C. | V V V D V | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 14 | SHINE Peter C. | D V V V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 15 | MCDERMOTT Brian | V V D V D V | V V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 16 | BORATGIS Christopher J. | V V V D V D | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 17 | LAVENSTEIN Kinley V. | D V V V V | D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 18 | REYES Vincent | V V D V D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 19 | KRAVIT Connor B. | D V V V D | V D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 20 | PAK Charles | D D V V V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 21 | SIDDIQUI HUMZA K. | D V D V V | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 22 | PARK Brian | V V V D D | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 23 | RODE Damian E. | D V V V D D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 24 | DIAS-LALCACA Kieran P. | D V D D V V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 25 | VAYSBUKH Konstantin | V D D V D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 26 | LAI Coby | D V D D V | V D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 27 | MORSE Tyler | D D D D V V | V D | 4.2 | 2 | -2.2 |
| 28 | BEYRICH Henry J. | V D D D V D | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 29 | SMITH Nicholas S. | V D D D D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 30 | KIM William M. | D D D D V | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 31 | WU Jason | D D D D V | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 32 | PLECHAVICIUS Daniel | D D D D D | V D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 33 | LEHR William D. | V D D V V | D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
| 34 | PAVATE Rishi | D D V D V V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 35 | POLKOVSKY Dylan S. | D V V D D | D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
| 36 | SYOMICHEV Daniel A. | D D V D V | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 37 | CONNELLY Asa D. | V V D D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 38 | HU Matthew | V D V D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 39 | WANG Eric S | V D V D D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 40 | TUCKER Owen J. | V D D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 41 | SINGCUENCO Lance | D D D D V | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 42 | LEWIS William J. | D D D V D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 43 | GARVEY Sean | D V D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 44 | CONNORS Jacob | D D V D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 45 | GILLIS George | D V D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 46 | SINGH RANA Shamtej | D D D V D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 47 | LI Brian | D D V D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 48 | WAGNER Max S. | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 49 | WANG Eric Jian | D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 50 | YUAN Zijie | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.