Nashville, TN - Nashville, TN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CHONG christopher | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 20% | |
2 | TRIMMER Colin | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | |
3 | LEONE III Charles D. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 31% | 7% |
3 | RHYU Kozmo | - | - | - | 6% | 25% | 44% | 25% |
5 | JUNG Minche | - | 3% | 19% | 40% | 30% | 7% | |
6 | KROPP Jack | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 38% |
7 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | - | 4% | 23% | 42% | 26% | 5% | |
8 | PINERO Jose J. | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% | |
9 | FERNANDEZ Santiago Martin | - | - | - | 3% | 22% | 51% | 24% |
10 | GATZA Logan | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% | |
11 | CLICK Aiden | 1% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 3% | |
12 | JACKSON James | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 4% |
13 | ROMERO KURI Carlos Alexander | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | 1% | - |
14 | SONG Ervin | 13% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - | |
15 | WIMMER Nathaniel P. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% | |
16 | TIYA BIAYA K. | - | - | 6% | 25% | 43% | 26% | |
17 | KIM Dylan J. | 1% | 19% | 40% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
18 | O'CONNOR Riley | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% | |
19 | JAAFAR Omar | - | 4% | 28% | 44% | 20% | 3% | - |
20 | JEON Hwidong | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
21 | SARIKONDA Akhil | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 5% | |
22 | FU Ethan | 2% | 16% | 39% | 32% | 10% | 1% | |
23 | DESTEFANO Julius | 3% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | |
24 | TREBON Hayden | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% | |
25 | ALTUVE Alejandro J. | 1% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
26 | FORSYTHE Hunter | - | 5% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
27 | SCHARF Ryan | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
28 | MUMMIDI Rishi | - | 7% | 38% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
29 | DU alan | 8% | 34% | 40% | 16% | 2% | - | |
30 | BERKOWITZ Jeffrey | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | |
31 | CHOI Marcus | 44% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
32 | VACCARO Dominick J. | 41% | 40% | 15% | 3% | - | - | |
33 | PATEL Kushal | 7% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | |
34 | ALLEY Everett T | 14% | 41% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | |
35 | DAVIS Jonah | 20% | 59% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
36 | SINGH Aryaman | 3% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
37 | BRUSH Kyle | 81% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | |
38 | GRECU Catalin | 66% | 32% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.