Nashville, TN - Nashville, TN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHONG christopher | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% | |
| 2 | TRIMMER Colin | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 5% | |
| 3 | LEONE III Charles D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% | 7% |
| 3 | RHYU Kozmo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 25% |
| 5 | JUNG Minche | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 38% | 7% | |
| 6 | KROPP Jack | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 38% |
| 7 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 31% | 5% | |
| 8 | PINERO Jose J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% | |
| 9 | FERNANDEZ Santiago Martin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 24% |
| 10 | GATZA Logan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 39% | |
| 11 | CLICK Aiden | 100% | 99% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% | |
| 12 | JACKSON James | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
| 13 | ROMERO KURI Carlos Alexander | 100% | 87% | 54% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 14 | SONG Ervin | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 15 | WIMMER Nathaniel P. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 14% | |
| 16 | TIYA BIAYA K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 26% | |
| 17 | KIM Dylan J. | 100% | 99% | 80% | 40% | 10% | 1% | |
| 18 | O'CONNOR Riley | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 8% | |
| 19 | JAAFAR Omar | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% | 23% | 3% | - |
| 20 | JEON Hwidong | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 21 | SARIKONDA Akhil | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 33% | 5% | |
| 22 | FU Ethan | 100% | 98% | 82% | 43% | 12% | 1% | |
| 23 | DESTEFANO Julius | 100% | 97% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 2% | |
| 24 | TREBON Hayden | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% | |
| 25 | ALTUVE Alejandro J. | 100% | 99% | 78% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
| 26 | FORSYTHE Hunter | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
| 27 | SCHARF Ryan | 100% | 92% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 28 | MUMMIDI Rishi | 100% | 100% | 93% | 55% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 29 | DU alan | 100% | 92% | 58% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 30 | BERKOWITZ Jeffrey | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 7% | |
| 31 | CHOI Marcus | 100% | 56% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 32 | VACCARO Dominick J. | 100% | 59% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 33 | PATEL Kushal | 100% | 93% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 34 | ALLEY Everett T | 100% | 86% | 45% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 35 | DAVIS Jonah | 100% | 80% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 36 | SINGH Aryaman | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 37 | BRUSH Kyle | 100% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 38 | GRECU Catalin | 100% | 34% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.