Nashville, TN - Nashville, TN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | XIAO Enoch A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% |
| 2 | XIAO Ethan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% |
| 3 | GRIFFITH JACK | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 18% | |
| 3 | MITCHELL Philip D. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 15% | |
| 5 | ARIZA Isaac A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 48% |
| 6 | SONG Leonardo T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 33% | 4% |
| 7 | STANLEY Mason B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% | 23% |
| 8 | GRISWOLD Abel B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 28% | 3% |
| 9 | CHOUN Samuel Minwook | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 40% | |
| 10 | GATZA Logan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 34% | 7% | - |
| 11 | GRAHAM Roy J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 36% | 5% |
| 12 | ZHANG Andy W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 31% | |
| 13 | SICHITIU Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 22% | 2% |
| 14 | WILLIAMS Connor J. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 15 | MEYERS Lee P. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 25% | 4% | |
| 16 | LEE Jacob | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 17 | ZHAO Dylan L. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 15% | 1% | - |
| 18 | WECHSLER Jacob | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 19 | KEE Andrew L. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 50% | 13% | 1% | |
| 20 | ALLAMPALLAM Maanav V. | 100% | 89% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 21 | OH SEAN | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 15% | 1% | |
| 22 | FIGUEROA ANDRES | 100% | 95% | 59% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 23 | KIM Chaemin | 100% | 75% | 31% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 24 | SYLVESTER William Z. | 100% | 84% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 25 | YIM Alex | 100% | 86% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 26 | COLLUM Thomas | 100% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 27 | GRASS James D. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 28 | LATIF Ali A. | 100% | 66% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 29 | AMMON Blue | 100% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 30 | EMENHEISER Conrad | 100% | 94% | 53% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 31 | ROSSEN Michael | 100% | 89% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 32 | DONDERIS AJ | 100% | 98% | 81% | 38% | 7% | - | - |
| 33 | CAPELLUA Tommaso | 100% | 98% | 75% | 31% | 5% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.