San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LUH Ethan K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 49% | 11% |
| 2 | BANERJEE Anup | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% |
| 3 | NG Eben S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 30% |
| 3 | DETERING Julian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 18% | 2% |
| 5 | GODZHIK Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 24% |
| 6 | COELHO Cristiano P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% |
| 7 | FINNEY Lorenz | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 11% | < 1% |
| 8 | TSAY Jeremy M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 31% |
| 9 | AIBEL Hudson J. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 10 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 6% |
| 11 | KHER Roan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 37% | 12% | 2% |
| 12 | BAO Aaron | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 13 | BAEK David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 14% |
| 14 | MASCARI DUMONT Louis | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 5% | - |
| 15 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% |
| 16 | WU Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 11% |
| 17 | CANLAS Nathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 7% |
| 18 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 22% | 3% |
| 19 | MA Andrew | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 20 | CHEN Justin K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 40% | 11% |
| 21 | ZHANG Jiening G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% |
| 22 | WYMAN Julian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 30% |
| 23 | WANG Ethan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 24 | TAN Christien | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 25 | CHENG Jonathan | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 26 | KANG Anthony Jaegu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 29% |
| 27 | CHASTAINE Ryan L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 49% | 13% | 1% |
| 28 | MA Bryant | 100% | 98% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 29 | HOSKERI Anik S. | 100% | 80% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 30 | FRANC Geoffrey C. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 31 | RUBIN Max | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 32 | LLIDO Soren | 100% | 76% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | SMITH Grant D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 34% | 4% |
| 34 | ZENG Chuyi | 100% | 92% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 35 | LYNCH Owen C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 27% | 3% |
| 36 | MAK Osman K. | 100% | 90% | 57% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 37 | WOO Christian | 100% | 97% | 78% | 35% | 6% | - | - |
| 38 | CO Dylan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 22% |
| 39 | ZUO Ethan | 100% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 40 | SHEN Owen | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 41 | TONKOVICH Ryan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 42 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
| 43 | LI Jett | 100% | 75% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 44 | TEH Ryan | 100% | 94% | 54% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 45 | CORTRIGHT Skipper (Matthew) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 19% |
| 45 | CAZALET George | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 33% | 7% | 1% |
| 47 | RANJITH Yash M. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 49 | SUN Christopher | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 50 | NG Micah | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 51 | CHEN Evan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
| 52 | MYERS Dean | 100% | 89% | 53% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | LING Eddie | 100% | 98% | 84% | 55% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 54 | SHPOLYANSKY Jax F. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 54 | JIANG Alex | 100% | 91% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 56 | BHARADWAJ Venkatesh | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 57 | GREGORY Henry F. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 58 | AGRAWAL Niki | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 14% | 1% | - |
| 59 | TUAN Evan | 100% | 50% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 60 | JUDSON Colin | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 62 | RAMOS Owen | 100% | 94% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 63 | SAH Steven | 100% | 99% | 85% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 64 | ZWICKER Jacob | 100% | 96% | 71% | 29% | 4% | - | - |
| 65 | PETERSON Lucas | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 66 | CHU Colin | 100% | 83% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 67 | CHEN Tyler | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 8% | - |
| 68 | HOLLENBECK Walker | 100% | 93% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 69 | MIN Lucas | 100% | 48% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 70 | LAURIMAA Emil | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.