National Harbor, MD - National Harbor, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DODIN David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% |
| 2 | ZHENG Andy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 26% |
| 3 | SAUNIER Cameron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 32% |
| 3 | VYSOTSKIY Evan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 23% | |
| 5 | KUGLER Luke | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 20% |
| 6 | TRULL A.J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 30% | 4% |
| 7 | YU Jason | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 14% | |
| 8 | LEE Aiden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% | |
| 9 | LAI Boden | 100% | 98% | 79% | 41% | 12% | 1% | |
| 10 | GINZBURG Adam | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 21% | 2% | |
| 11 | BRADSHAW Carter | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 12 | MAO Benjamin | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 34% | 7% | |
| 13 | JIANG Matthew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% |
| 14 | MITEV Alexander | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 11% | |
| 15 | DURKIN Hudson | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
| 16 | LAM Alan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 20% | 2% | |
| 17 | ZHANG Chaoran | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 49% | 18% | 2% |
| 18 | CHUTKAY Sai Pratham | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 51% | |
| 19 | BUI Henry | 100% | 98% | 78% | 34% | 6% | - | |
| 20 | NAKAS Levent | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 22% |
| 21 | ZENG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 11% | |
| 22 | CHEN Bowen | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 18% | 2% | |
| 23 | LU Nathan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 2% | |
| 24 | SOKOL Luke | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 25 | SIEDOW William | 100% | 79% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 26 | ALI Farhan | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 27 | MOY Madison | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 60% | |
| 28 | BANSAL Arjun | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 21% | |
| 29 | SINGH Ravin | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 30 | WANG Xiuqi(Arthur) | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 31 | ROLAND Mackinley | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
| 32 | CHAWLA aarav | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% | - |
| 33 | BRODETSKY Maxim | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 34 | RATMANSKY Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% | 10% | |
| 35 | ALEXANDER John | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 6% | 1% | |
| 36 | GRENKE Dexter | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
| 37 | YIN Justin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 32% | 1% |
| 38 | BORISENKO Samuel | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 39 | FARBER Ian S. | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 40 | SINGLETON Aman | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 40 | GORDON Ian | 100% | 92% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 42 | ARMSTRONG TyLee | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 42 | KIM Tae | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 44 | LOISEAU Oscar | 100% | 94% | 70% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 45 | BO Genero | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 46 | PAN Edwin | 100% | 98% | 84% | 55% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 47 | ZIEGLER John | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 5% | |
| 48 | DOAN Christopher | 100% | 83% | 36% | 7% | - | - | |
| 49 | KATSEV edward | 100% | 99% | 85% | 49% | 15% | 2% | |
| 50 | HARRIS Troy O. | 100% | 64% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 51 | SHAFFER Tyler | 100% | 69% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 52 | NAM Nathaniel | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 53 | LEE DoWon | 100% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 54 | YAO Tristan | 100% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 55 | KIM Henry | 100% | 49% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 56 | HOYOS PALACIOS David | 100% | 82% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 57 | YU Rainger | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 58 | KIM Julian | 100% | 82% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.