San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHENG Alan H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 9% |
| 2 | ZENG Lucas H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 63% | 23% |
| 3 | MAO Connor | 100% | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 3 | OH Samuel H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 13% |
| 5 | MARTINEZ Donavyn E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 60% |
| 6 | URODOVSKIKH Evan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 4% |
| 7 | DIVITO Dylan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% |
| 8 | XIAO EDWARD | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 9 | GRANT Lachlan K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
| 10 | ZHANG Luke T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 7% |
| 11 | SCHLESINGER Nathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 6% |
| 12 | KUMBLA Samarth | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% | |
| 13 | CHOI Ethan L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% |
| 14 | HUANG Bernard | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 15 | WENDLER Alexander J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 28% | 5% |
| 16 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 17 | SHIH William | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 10% |
| 18 | DARIANO Noah G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 20% | 2% |
| 19 | OTAKE Jared K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% |
| 20 | CHOI Samuel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 21 | SPEVAK Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 12% |
| 22 | HOBSON Aaron K. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
| 23 | DESAI Nalin H. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 40% | 9% | 1% |
| 24 | BERMENDER Cameron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% |
| 25 | ANDRIONO Raymond Rafael | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 29% | 6% |
| 26 | LIN Dashiell | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 9% |
| 27 | CURLEY Sebastian D. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 5% | |
| 28 | TSAY Jeremy M. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 2% |
| 29 | PHAM-CHANG Duke A. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 30 | DAVIS Christopher M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 18% | 2% |
| 31 | YU Anders | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
| 32 | PATINO Yahir | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 33 | AVRON Case B. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 34 | WU Conrad J. | 100% | 98% | 72% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 35 | BALDWIN Timothy M. | 100% | 98% | 80% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 36 | TSANG Matthew K. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% | |
| 37 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | 100% | 90% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 38 | MOHAMMAD Abdulwahab | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 10% |
| 39 | LIM Charles Q. | 100% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 40 | SWEENEY Quentin | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 41 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 26% | 4% | - |
| 42 | NG Eben S. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
| 43 | UZGIRIS Kovas | 100% | 77% | 36% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 44 | SCHUR Skyler | 100% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 45 | SHERMAN Marco J. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
| 46 | VUKAZICH Carlo | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 47 | MURATA Akitoshi D. | 100% | 80% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | DANKAR Neel | 100% | 100% | 91% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 49 | LEE Jesse | 100% | 58% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 50 | BAEK David | 100% | 87% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 51 | DESSAUER Tobyn M. | 100% | 75% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 51 | MU Jeffrey | 100% | 76% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | WONG Louis | 100% | 35% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 54 | STIAGUN Nikita | 100% | 83% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 55 | ARREDONDO Rafael | 100% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.