San Francisco, CA - San Francisco, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HUSSAIN Kamran | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 58% | 24% | 4% |
| 2 | RYAN Seth C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 24% | |
| 3 | GREEN Jabreel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% | |
| 3 | ZHANG Alec | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 13% | |
| 5 | PARK Elliot | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 27% | |
| 6 | ZAYDMAN David M. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 25% | 4% | |
| 7 | CASASSOVICI Georges | 100% | 99% | 89% | 65% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 8 | SARKAR agniv | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 3% | |
| 9 | KIM Benjamin I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 87% | 59% | 21% |
| 10 | LOWE-THORPE Tyler | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 60% | 8% | |
| 11 | WONG KEVIN | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 21% | |
| 12 | LIU Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 38% |
| 13 | BAGCHI Aritra | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 12% |
| 14 | WILLIS Alan T. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 4% | |
| 15 | MING Nathan | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 16 | SARKAR Anish | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 1% | |
| 17 | WRIGHT Christopher | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 28% |
| 18 | KATZ Matheo | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% | |
| 19 | LAU Matthew | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 20 | MALEEV Georgy | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 21 | ZHANG Nathan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 22 | WATT Darren | 100% | 70% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 23 | ZHANG Andrew | 100% | 75% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 24 | KUO Rylan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% | 14% | 1% | |
| 25 | FINK August | 100% | 76% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 26 | ZHUANG William | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 13% | 2% | |
| 27 | PAI Julian | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 5% | |
| 28 | BURLING Trenor | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 29 | RAMOS Owen | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
| 30 | RAJ Shrey | 100% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | CASTELLY Luke | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 5% | |
| 32 | ULINICH Alexander | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 33 | CHEN Bailey | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 9% | |
| 34 | GUPTA Karan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 22% | 3% | |
| 35 | HE Zhiheng | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% |
| 36 | MONDALA Adrian | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 37 | BARTON Henry | 100% | 95% | 74% | 41% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 38 | ANDERSON Kai | 100% | 96% | 78% | 46% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 39 | LIANG derek | 100% | 88% | 51% | 15% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | YU Austin | 100% | 98% | 85% | 48% | 11% | 1% | |
| 40 | LEE Bryson | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 16% | 2% | |
| 42 | BHATT Arjun | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 43 | BHARGAV Angad | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 44 | KNUDSEN Travis | 100% | 92% | 66% | 32% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 45 | WONG Ethan | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 46 | CHEN Daniel | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 47 | OYANG Theodore (Teddy) | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 48 | HOLLAND Thomas | 100% | 96% | 77% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 49 | BENNETT Peter | 100% | 85% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 50 | DELOCHE Hunter | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 51 | FU VINCENT | 100% | 93% | 53% | 11% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.