San Francisco, CA - San Francisco, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LO Conrad | - | - | - | - | 1% | 14% | 85% |
| 2 | HOSKERI Anik S. | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 43% |
| 3 | TUAN Evan | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 1% |
| 3 | KIM Ryan Y. | - | - | - | 8% | 59% | 32% | |
| 5 | KANG Anthony Jaegu | - | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 72% |
| 6 | CHEN Justin K. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 11% |
| 7 | LEVY Jacob | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 42% | 21% | 1% |
| 8 | SHEN Owen | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 9 | WANG Ethan | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% |
| 10 | LI Jett | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 8% |
| 11 | MA Andrew | - | - | - | 3% | 39% | 59% | |
| 12 | COELHO Cristiano P. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 17% | 81% |
| 13 | FUKUDA Diego | - | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 13% |
| 14 | WOO Christian | - | - | - | 2% | 17% | 44% | 37% |
| 15 | RUBIN Max | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 16 | CORTRIGHT Skipper (Matthew) | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
| 17 | RANJITH Yash M. | - | 1% | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
| 18 | WU Alber Y. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% |
| 19 | ZHANG Jiening G. | - | - | - | 6% | 27% | 43% | 23% |
| 20 | MAK Osman K. | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 2% |
| 21 | WU Lucas | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 7% |
| 22 | FANG Jaden | - | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 23 | ZENG Chuyi | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 24 | DERRICK Blake | - | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 36% | 11% |
| 25 | PONCIN Sebastian A. | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
| 26 | NG Micah | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 1% |
| 27 | LING Eddie | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 28 | MA Bryant | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 29 | RASMUSSEN Sage | - | 1% | 13% | 39% | 36% | 11% | - |
| 30 | TONKOVICH Ryan | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 31 | FLIGOR William | 2% | 17% | 48% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 32 | UHLIG Cole | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 36% | 13% | 2% |
| 33 | LIU William | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 34 | MORROW Brenden | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
| 35 | SHEN Oliver | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
| 36 | CHAN Connor | 8% | 32% | 41% | 18% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | CHU Colin | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 38 | CO Dylan | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% |
| 39 | LAM Nicolas | 1% | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 40 | LIU Aaron | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 41 | HSU Theodore | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 22% | 1% |
| 42 | SONG Matthew | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 43 | UPENDER West | 40% | 42% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 44 | MANIKTALA Suvir | 2% | 18% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 45 | EDISON Ansel | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | GORDON William L. | 6% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 47 | ZHANG Luke | 8% | 31% | 42% | 19% | 1% | - | |
| 48 | SEO Shawn | 2% | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 49 | AGRAWAL Niki | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 50 | LO Preston | - | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 7% |
| 51 | KAREHT Kai | 13% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 52 | FAWSON Leo | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 53 | SISINNI Riccardo | 6% | 30% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 54 | YUE Jackson | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 55 | SAH Steven | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 55 | LOFTUS Luca | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% |
| 57 | ZHANG Jayden | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 58 | TSAY Jordan R. | 3% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 59 | WONG Esmond | 13% | 38% | 36% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 60 | SUNG Samuel | 8% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 61 | CHUN Dashel | 30% | 41% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 62 | RAY Oliver | 81% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 63 | LUI Jake | 5% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 64 | SUN Ryan | 58% | 35% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 65 | KALAMAS Nikolas | 36% | 44% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 66 | LU Lucas | 12% | 46% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 67 | TSAGAAN Alex | 2% | 17% | 39% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 68 | TAM Nathan | 8% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 69 | TSAGAAN Arthur | 16% | 40% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 70 | GOLWALA Yash | 20% | 43% | 29% | 7% | - | - | |
| 71 | POTTS Diego | 30% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 72 | HUANG Stanley | 11% | 35% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 73 | VARI Julian | 8% | 32% | 37% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 73 | PARK Jaden | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 75 | MANDAL Aneek | 2% | 62% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 76 | ZHOU Ryan | 53% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.