San Francisco, CA - San Francisco, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LO Conrad | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% |
2 | HOSKERI Anik S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 43% |
3 | TUAN Evan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 18% | 1% |
3 | KIM Ryan Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 91% | 32% | |
5 | KANG Anthony Jaegu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% |
6 | CHEN Justin K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 48% | 11% |
7 | LEVY Jacob | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 21% | 1% |
8 | SHEN Owen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 27% | 5% |
9 | WANG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 23% |
10 | LI Jett | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 36% | 8% |
11 | MA Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 59% | |
12 | COELHO Cristiano P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 81% |
13 | FUKUDA Diego | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 13% |
14 | WOO Christian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 37% |
15 | RUBIN Max | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
16 | CORTRIGHT Skipper (Matthew) | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 6% |
17 | RANJITH Yash M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 11% |
18 | WU Alber Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 46% | 13% |
19 | ZHANG Jiening G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 23% |
20 | MAK Osman K. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 25% | 2% |
21 | WU Lucas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 65% | 31% | 7% |
22 | FANG Jaden | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
23 | ZENG Chuyi | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
24 | DERRICK Blake | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 11% |
25 | PONCIN Sebastian A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 4% |
26 | NG Micah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 20% | 1% |
27 | LING Eddie | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 27% | 5% |
28 | MA Bryant | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
29 | RASMUSSEN Sage | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 47% | 11% | - |
30 | TONKOVICH Ryan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
31 | FLIGOR William | 100% | 98% | 81% | 33% | 6% | 1% | - |
32 | UHLIG Cole | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% | 14% | 2% |
33 | LIU William | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
34 | MORROW Brenden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 6% |
35 | SHEN Oliver | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
36 | CHAN Connor | 100% | 92% | 60% | 19% | 1% | - | |
37 | CHU Colin | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
38 | CO Dylan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 5% |
39 | LAM Nicolas | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
40 | LIU Aaron | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
41 | HSU Theodore | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 23% | 1% |
42 | SONG Matthew | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 28% | 5% | - |
43 | UPENDER West | 100% | 60% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
44 | MANIKTALA Suvir | 100% | 98% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
45 | EDISON Ansel | 100% | 69% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
46 | GORDON William L. | 100% | 94% | 67% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - |
47 | ZHANG Luke | 100% | 92% | 61% | 20% | 1% | - | |
48 | SEO Shawn | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - |
49 | AGRAWAL Niki | 100% | 92% | 65% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
50 | LO Preston | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 7% |
51 | KAREHT Kai | 100% | 87% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
52 | FAWSON Leo | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
53 | SISINNI Riccardo | 100% | 94% | 65% | 26% | 6% | - | - |
54 | YUE Jackson | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
55 | SAH Steven | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 18% | 3% |
55 | LOFTUS Luca | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
57 | ZHANG Jayden | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 6% | - |
58 | TSAY Jordan R. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - |
59 | WONG Esmond | 100% | 87% | 49% | 13% | 1% | - | |
60 | SUNG Samuel | 100% | 92% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
61 | CHUN Dashel | 100% | 70% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
62 | RAY Oliver | 100% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
63 | LUI Jake | 100% | 95% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
64 | SUN Ryan | 100% | 42% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
65 | KALAMAS Nikolas | 100% | 64% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
66 | LU Lucas | 100% | 88% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
67 | TSAGAAN Alex | 100% | 98% | 81% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - |
68 | TAM Nathan | 100% | 92% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
69 | TSAGAAN Arthur | 100% | 84% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
70 | GOLWALA Yash | 100% | 80% | 37% | 7% | - | - | |
71 | POTTS Diego | 100% | 70% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
72 | HUANG Stanley | 100% | 89% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
73 | VARI Julian | 100% | 92% | 61% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
73 | PARK Jaden | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
75 | MANDAL Aneek | 100% | 98% | 36% | 5% | - | - | - |
76 | ZHOU Ryan | 100% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.