Denver Fencing Center - Denver, CO, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GARLINGTON David | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 9% | |
| 2 | REES Daniel I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 22% |
| 3 | WESTEN Zachary (Zack) C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 10% | |
| 3 | WALSH Kevin | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 14% | 1% | |
| 5 | BLYTH Jourdain L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 32% | |
| 6 | MCGINNIS Aidan K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 20% | |
| 7 | SHUGART Henry R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 20% |
| 8 | CELECKI Barrett | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 9 | BRANDRETH Garret | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 12% |
| 10 | SUBRAMANIAN Arjuna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 29% | 4% |
| 11 | POCHON Adam V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
| 12 | CAMPBELL Grant M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% | |
| 13 | GASPAROVICH IV George M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 56% | 12% | |
| 14 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 36% |
| 15 | TAFOYA Devin D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 15% |
| 16 | CHAN Andrew M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
| 17 | BOYCE Samuel H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 32% | 6% |
| 18 | MILLETT Seamus T. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 19 | ALTMAN Jeff H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 55% | 10% | |
| 20 | ALLGEIER Peter | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 4% |
| 22 | CHERIS Zachariah A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 18% |
| 23 | ANDERSON Brendan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 38% | 12% | 2% |
| 23 | GOLDMAN Rami | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% | 2% |
| 25 | SMITH Jackson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 25% |
| 26 | KAJI Ty | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 27 | SOLTER Kai | 100% | 97% | 77% | 35% | 7% | 1% | |
| 28 | CLAYMAN John A. | 100% | 99% | 85% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 29 | TOTEMEIER Ann M. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 29% | 5% | - |
| 30 | ERKENBECK Nathan M. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 31 | COLE Matthew | 100% | 96% | 70% | 17% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | ANDERSON Henry | 100% | 99% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 33 | BUVARP Elisabeth M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 39% | 8% |
| 34 | EBELL Ivan D. | 100% | 94% | 63% | 20% | 2% | - | |
| 35 | WEBER Nora | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 36 | NIEMANN Avery | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 37 | BARON Sabina | 100% | 78% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 38 | HENDRICK Heidi M. | 100% | 98% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 39 | STRAUSS Luke | 100% | 100% | 93% | 52% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 40 | TIBBETTS Johnathan | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 41 | HARBIN Layla | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 15% | 2% | |
| 42 | SAUTHOFF Chris | 100% | 92% | 40% | 7% | - | - | |
| 43 | SAINT-PHARD Shana | 100% | 97% | 69% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 44 | BURCH Tristan H. | 100% | 86% | 44% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 45 | GROGAN Hunter K. | 100% | 85% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 46 | ANDERSON Alan J. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 47 | DAVIS Greg | 100% | 89% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 48 | NIETZER Jo A. | 100% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 49 | MOORE Hunter | 100% | 89% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 50 | DAVIS Emma | 100% | 63% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 51 | SCHELL Julia | 100% | 67% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 52 | BRETT Joseph | 100% | 71% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | BRETT Mary | 100% | 78% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 55 | LUTTON Patricia | 100% | 37% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.