Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | MECHKOV Iliya | V V V V V D | V V V V V | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
| 2 | SCHROEDER III Robert | D V V V V | V V V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 3 | ROUSE Brian G. | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 3 | HAMPTON Maxwell | V V D V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 5 | MCDERMOTT Brian | V V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 6 | BELLIVEAU Raven C. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 7 | GUI Runlin | V D V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 8 | HARRIS Robert S. | D V V D D | V V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 9 | WYATT Seth | V V V D V | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 10 | JANKOWICH Alexander E. | V V V V D | V D | 1.5 | 4 | +2.5 |
| 11 | ADAMIAN David | D D V V V V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 12 | MELCHER Jack H. | D V D V V | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 13 | KANNAIR Carson | V V D V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 14 | FOLEY Kevin | V D D V D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 15 | THORDARSON Paul (Thor) J. | D D V V D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 16 | MATEI Daniel | D D V D V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 17 | SENERTH Ian | D V V V V | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 18 | SUMLER Jeffery | V V V D V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 19 | MULLARKEY Edward (Ed) | V V V D V | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 20 | WEN Jiazheng | V V D D V V | D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 21 | ABELE Chris | V V D D V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 22 | PATENAUDE Kameron | V D V D V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 23 | SMEDLEY Drew N. | V D D V D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 24 | PAGE Duncan | V D D V D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 25 | PAGE Andrew (Drew) (Drew) | D D V V D | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 26 | BENINI Alexander J. | V V D D D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 27 | KAIN Brad | V D D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 28 | GERSEN Jacob | D D V D D | V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 29 | MACNEIL Drew A. | D D D D V | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 29 | ZHANG Zixian (Shawn) | D V D D D | V D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 31 | NORTON Theo B. | D D D D V | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 32 | REINEKE Gerhard | D D V D D D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 33 | HOFMANN Werner | D D D V D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 34 | WALTING Paul J. | D D D D D | D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
| 35 | ALVES PEREIRA Francisco Xavier | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 36 | REINEKE Alexander | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 37 | DUMAS Wesley | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.