Orlando, FL - Orlando, FL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KEE Andrew L. | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | |
2 | CULLIVAN Justice | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 44% | 45% |
3 | MUSHER Benjamin J. | - | - | - | 3% | 21% | 51% | 25% |
3 | TANG Owen S. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 9% |
5 | SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% |
5 | GODZHIK Zachary | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 25% |
7 | KNOEPFFLER Alex | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
8 | LEE Jacob | - | 5% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 5% | |
9 | LIN Michael | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
10 | LOVE Aaron | - | 2% | 13% | 37% | 37% | 11% | |
11 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | - | - | 4% | 24% | 44% | 27% | |
12 | NAYGAS LAWRENCE I. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 29% |
13 | SADOVSKY Leor B. | - | 6% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 5% | |
14 | WYMAN Julian | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 14% | |
15 | TIYA BIAYA K. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 50% | |
16 | DINSAY Kristjan | 12% | 39% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | |
17 | SAGE Michael P. | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
18 | LIU Michael H. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
19 | GARCIA Sebastian R. | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% | |
20 | LI Matthew | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 39% | 13% | |
21 | WONG Garrick G. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 22% | |
22 | CANO Marcos E. | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% |
23 | KRYLTSOV Michael | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 30% | 4% |
24 | ZHENG zhe | - | 1% | 10% | 35% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
25 | GOGOI Vir K. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
26 | ORTEGA Jose-Arnel | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 7% | - | |
27 | HEARN Christen J. | 1% | 6% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 4% | |
28 | ELWOOD Sebastian F. | - | 4% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% | |
29 | GORBACHEV Alexander | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% |
30 | ZHANG Jiening G. | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% | 2% |
31 | LORENZO Alejandro | 2% | 16% | 42% | 31% | 9% | 1% | |
32 | TSAO Lukas | 1% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
33 | LEE Lukas | 4% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
34 | ARIZA Abraham J. | - | 4% | 27% | 43% | 22% | 3% | - |
35 | FUKUDA Diego | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
36 | NGUYEN martin | 29% | 43% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
37 | RODRIGUEZ Lazaro S. | 42% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
38 | ALONSO Vinicius | 21% | 47% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
39 | MAO Lucas | - | 7% | 35% | 40% | 15% | 2% | - |
40 | WANG Brayden | 20% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
41 | ZHANG Aaron | 1% | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
42 | CHENG Ethan | 1% | 12% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
43 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% |
43 | SHEN Owen | 1% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
45 | KIAYIAS Aris | 5% | 27% | 42% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
46 | MORROW Brenden | 3% | 21% | 38% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
47 | BEAVER Aaron | 10% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
48 | QIAN Jason H. | - | 6% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 6% | |
49 | IVANENKO Alex | 17% | 50% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
50 | SUAREZ Adrian | 7% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | |
51 | HOGGARD Carson | 26% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
52 | ZOU Yuming | 39% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
53 | HOM Logan | 26% | 53% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
54 | DANIZ T FERNANDO A. | 14% | 39% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | |
55 | BURKETT Jackson Cash | 52% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
56 | FORSYTH Patrick | 47% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - | |
57 | CHEN Junxuan | 63% | 31% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
57 | CAO Vincent | 51% | 41% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
59 | GRIJALBA Gabriel | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.