Orlando, FL - Orlando, FL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KEE Andrew L. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 10% | |
2 | CULLIVAN Justice | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 45% |
3 | MUSHER Benjamin J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 25% |
3 | TANG Owen S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 9% |
5 | SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% |
5 | GODZHIK Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 25% |
7 | KNOEPFFLER Alex | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 42% | 10% |
8 | LEE Jacob | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 34% | 5% | |
9 | LIN Michael | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
10 | LOVE Aaron | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 48% | 11% | |
11 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 27% | |
12 | NAYGAS LAWRENCE I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 29% |
13 | SADOVSKY Leor B. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 29% | 5% | |
14 | WYMAN Julian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 14% | |
15 | TIYA BIAYA K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% | |
16 | DINSAY Kristjan | 100% | 88% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | |
17 | SAGE Michael P. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 22% | 3% |
18 | LIU Michael H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 7% |
19 | GARCIA Sebastian R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 13% | |
20 | LI Matthew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 13% | |
21 | WONG Garrick G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 22% | |
22 | CANO Marcos E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 4% |
23 | KRYLTSOV Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 34% | 4% |
24 | ZHENG zhe | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 13% | 1% |
25 | GOGOI Vir K. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - |
26 | ORTEGA Jose-Arnel | 100% | 95% | 72% | 32% | 7% | - | |
27 | HEARN Christen J. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 29% | 4% | |
28 | ELWOOD Sebastian F. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 8% | |
29 | GORBACHEV Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 39% | 10% |
30 | ZHANG Jiening G. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 18% | 2% |
31 | LORENZO Alejandro | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% | 10% | 1% | |
32 | TSAO Lukas | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
33 | LEE Lukas | 100% | 96% | 73% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
34 | ARIZA Abraham J. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 26% | 3% | - |
35 | FUKUDA Diego | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
36 | NGUYEN martin | 100% | 71% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
37 | RODRIGUEZ Lazaro S. | 100% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
38 | ALONSO Vinicius | 100% | 79% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
39 | MAO Lucas | 100% | 100% | 92% | 57% | 17% | 2% | - |
40 | WANG Brayden | 100% | 80% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
41 | ZHANG Aaron | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 26% | 5% | - |
42 | CHENG Ethan | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - |
43 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% |
43 | SHEN Owen | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - |
45 | KIAYIAS Aris | 100% | 95% | 67% | 25% | 4% | - | - |
46 | MORROW Brenden | 100% | 97% | 76% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
47 | BEAVER Aaron | 100% | 90% | 58% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
48 | QIAN Jason H. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 32% | 6% | |
49 | IVANENKO Alex | 100% | 83% | 33% | 6% | - | - | |
50 | SUAREZ Adrian | 100% | 93% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - | |
51 | HOGGARD Carson | 100% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
52 | ZOU Yuming | 100% | 61% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
53 | HOM Logan | 100% | 74% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - |
54 | DANIZ T FERNANDO A. | 100% | 86% | 47% | 13% | 2% | - | |
55 | BURKETT Jackson Cash | 100% | 48% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
56 | FORSYTH Patrick | 100% | 53% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
57 | CHEN Junxuan | 100% | 37% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
57 | CAO Vincent | 100% | 49% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
59 | GRIJALBA Gabriel | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.