Deerfield, IL - Deerfield, IL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | XIAO Enoch A. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 2 | DESERANNO Jeidus | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
| 3 | HERGAN Luca A. | V V V V V | V V V D | 2.3 | 5 | +2.7 |
| 3 | SONG Aiden S. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 5 | ZHAO Jason L. | V V V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 6 | XIAO Ethan J. | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 7 | LEE Joshua | V D D V V | V V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 8 | BRUK Peter J. | D V D D V | V V V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 9 | KAO Castor T. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
| 10 | CHIN Julian S. | V D V V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 11 | SHA Yi Peng | D V V V V D | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 12 | BING Charles | D V V D V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 13 | LI Richard | V D V D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 14 | LEE Aidan | V V V D D | V V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 15 | LO Conrad | V V D V D | V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 16 | CHAN Tyler | D V V D V D | V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 17 | KIM Tei D. | V D V V V V | D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 18 | OH Sean | D V V V D V | D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 19 | FREEDMAN Samuel E. | V V D D V V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 20 | KEE Andrew L. | V D V V D V | D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 21 | YANG Luao | V D V V D V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 22 | KIM Derek A. | D V D V V V | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 23 | ORR Spencer | V V D V D V | D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
| 24 | FAVORITE William S. | V D D D V V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 25 | KIM Jackson | D V D D V | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 26 | REEVES Liam | V V D D D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 27 | TORRES Treston | D D V V D | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 28 | WILLETT Luc G. | V D D V D D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 29 | WANG Jackson | V D V D D D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 30 | LIU Michael H. | D V D V D D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 31 | LOVIN Vlad | D D D V D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 32 | SHEN Troy R. | D D D D D | V D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 33 | TSAO Lukas | D V V D V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 34 | JI Aidan Y. | D V D V D D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 35 | FORTUNE Alexander J. | D D V D V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 36 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | D D D D V V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 37 | LIU Jacob B. | D D V D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 38 | CHEN Kyle P. | D D D V D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 39 | SANTOS Carlos R. | D D V D D D | D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
| 40 | CULLIVAN Justice | D D V D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 41 | SHEN Luke R. | V D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 42 | POLONSKI Anthony | D V D D D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 43 | DEGROOT Blake | D D D D D V | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 44 | BROSS James | D V D D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 45 | KIM Ryan Y. | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 46 | YANG Nathan | D D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.