Deerfield, IL - Deerfield, IL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | XIAO Enoch A. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% |
| 2 | DESERANNO Jeidus | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 50% |
| 3 | HERGAN Luca A. | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
| 3 | SONG Aiden S. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 37% | |
| 5 | ZHAO Jason L. | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 64% | |
| 6 | XIAO Ethan J. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% |
| 7 | LEE Joshua | - | 3% | 18% | 40% | 33% | 5% | |
| 8 | BRUK Peter J. | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 1% | |
| 9 | KAO Castor T. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 41% | 22% |
| 10 | CHIN Julian S. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% | |
| 11 | SHA Yi Peng | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 1% | - |
| 12 | BING Charles | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 3% |
| 13 | LI Richard | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 6% | |
| 14 | LEE Aidan | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 21% | |
| 15 | LO Conrad | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% | |
| 16 | CHAN Tyler | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 17 | KIM Tei D. | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 45% | 32% |
| 18 | OH Sean | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 16% |
| 19 | FREEDMAN Samuel E. | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 20 | KEE Andrew L. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 35% | 10% |
| 21 | YANG Luao | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
| 22 | KIM Derek A. | 1% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 23 | ORR Spencer | - | - | - | 4% | 23% | 55% | 18% |
| 24 | FAVORITE William S. | 1% | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 25 | KIM Jackson | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | |
| 26 | REEVES Liam | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 18% | 1% | |
| 27 | TORRES Treston | 17% | 41% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 28 | WILLETT Luc G. | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 29 | WANG Jackson | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 30 | LIU Michael H. | 3% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 31 | LOVIN Vlad | 13% | 42% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | SHEN Troy R. | 30% | 43% | 21% | 5% | - | - | |
| 33 | TSAO Lukas | 2% | 18% | 40% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
| 34 | JI Aidan Y. | 19% | 43% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 35 | FORTUNE Alexander J. | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 36 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 37 | LIU Jacob B. | 27% | 41% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | CHEN Kyle P. | 4% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 39 | SANTOS Carlos R. | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 40 | CULLIVAN Justice | 5% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 41 | SHEN Luke R. | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 42 | POLONSKI Anthony | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 43 | DEGROOT Blake | 22% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 44 | BROSS James | 2% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 45 | KIM Ryan Y. | 34% | 45% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 46 | YANG Nathan | 70% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.