RIMAC Arena @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MACHULSKY Leehi | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% |
| 2 | WU Amelia | - | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 65% |
| 3 | LAVERY Chloe K. | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 3 | LEE Natasha | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 3% | |
| 5 | BEI Karen | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 53% | |
| 6 | MYERS Jeanelle Christina A. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 5% |
| 7 | MONTOYA Kimberlee C. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% |
| 8 | CHEN Lefu | - | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 38% | 20% |
| 9 | LAN Alice S. | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 14% | |
| 10 | DARANOUVONG Logan | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
| 11 | WANG Nora | - | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 14% |
| 12 | BARBARA Camille | - | - | 4% | 25% | 43% | 25% | 2% |
| 13 | OPERARIO Abigail Z. | 2% | 13% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 2% | |
| 14 | MOHABIR Ariane | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
| 15 | KUKVA Taisiya | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 16 | MUN Brianna K. | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 17 | ZUHARS Renee A. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 42% | 27% | |
| 18 | ASSADOURIAN Nouneh | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 19 | SIVAGAR Fiona | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 41% | 17% | 1% |
| 20 | YAO Yilin | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 36% | 17% | 2% |
| 21 | ANDERSON Claire | 8% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 22 | LIN Ashley | 10% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 23 | KALE Anika A. | 1% | 6% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 4% | |
| 24 | DU Shunyi（Wendy） | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
| 25 | FELAND Alexandra | - | 4% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% | |
| 26 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 4% |
| 27 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 42% | 29% |
| 28 | BUSH Emma | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 29 | CHA Eugenie | 6% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 30 | NEISINGH Isabelle | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 31 | HEPLER Sarah | 1% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 32 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% | |
| 33 | BEZUGLAYA Varvara | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 3% | |
| 34 | SAYSON Samantha | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 26% | 8% |
| 35 | RAINEY Zoe-Andrea | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 36 | KAUSHISH Sara | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - | |
| 37 | MONTOYA Amy C. | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 18% | |
| 38 | WILEY Erica | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 43% | 28% | |
| 39 | MUNOZ Andrea H. | - | - | 3% | 22% | 43% | 28% | 4% |
| 40 | CAREY Michele S. | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 41 | EGENOLF Gabriella | 8% | 37% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | LORES Alicia | 1% | 8% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 43 | MARSH Janet L. | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 38% | 19% | 2% |
| 44 | KWON Tiara | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 45 | SOIN Anika A. | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% | |
| 46 | PRIMES Amanda M. | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
| 47 | CHIMIENTI Michele | 1% | 6% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 48 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | 1% | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 48 | HSIU Elizabeth | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 50 | WANG Angelina | 30% | 41% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | HUANG Lanlan | 9% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 52 | BROOKS Tean R. | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 23% | |
| 53 | LEE Olivia | 9% | 34% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 54 | DALEY Keira | 44% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 55 | LENDIS Gabrielle | 15% | 38% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 56 | TAN Jocelyn | 3% | 15% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 57 | MITRANI Gabriela | 16% | 44% | 33% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 58 | XU Katelyn | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 59 | MANDAP Svetlanna | 1% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 60 | NASON Amelia | 43% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 61 | LEE youngin | 26% | 42% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 62 | HAU Olivia | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 63 | LOUIE Sarah | 35% | 41% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 64 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | 43% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 65 | FRANEK Lisa | 24% | 43% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 66 | PERKINS-OLLILA Emily | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.