RIMAC Arena @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MACHULSKY Leehi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% |
| 2 | WU Amelia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% |
| 3 | LAVERY Chloe K. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 26% | 5% |
| 3 | LEE Natasha | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 22% | 3% | |
| 5 | BEI Karen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% | |
| 6 | MYERS Jeanelle Christina A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 5% |
| 7 | MONTOYA Kimberlee C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% |
| 8 | CHEN Lefu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 20% |
| 9 | LAN Alice S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 14% | |
| 10 | DARANOUVONG Logan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
| 11 | WANG Nora | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 14% |
| 12 | BARBARA Camille | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 27% | 2% |
| 13 | OPERARIO Abigail Z. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 17% | 2% | |
| 14 | MOHABIR Ariane | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 7% |
| 15 | KUKVA Taisiya | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 16 | MUN Brianna K. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 17 | ZUHARS Renee A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% | |
| 18 | ASSADOURIAN Nouneh | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 19 | SIVAGAR Fiona | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 59% | 18% | 1% |
| 20 | YAO Yilin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 19% | 2% |
| 21 | ANDERSON Claire | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 6% | 1% | |
| 22 | LIN Ashley | 100% | 90% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 23 | KALE Anika A. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 4% | |
| 24 | DU Shunyi（Wendy） | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 16% | 2% | |
| 25 | FELAND Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% | |
| 26 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 32% | 4% |
| 27 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 29% |
| 28 | BUSH Emma | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 29 | CHA Eugenie | 100% | 94% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 30 | NEISINGH Isabelle | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 31 | HEPLER Sarah | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 32 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
| 33 | BEZUGLAYA Varvara | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 20% | 3% | |
| 34 | SAYSON Samantha | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 34% | 8% |
| 35 | RAINEY Zoe-Andrea | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 36 | KAUSHISH Sara | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 37 | MONTOYA Amy C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 18% | |
| 38 | WILEY Erica | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% | |
| 39 | MUNOZ Andrea H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 32% | 4% |
| 40 | CAREY Michele S. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 41 | EGENOLF Gabriella | 100% | 92% | 55% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | LORES Alicia | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 43 | MARSH Janet L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 21% | 2% |
| 44 | KWON Tiara | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 45 | SOIN Anika A. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 12% | 1% | |
| 46 | PRIMES Amanda M. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% | |
| 47 | CHIMIENTI Michele | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
| 48 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 48 | HSIU Elizabeth | 100% | 76% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 50 | WANG Angelina | 100% | 70% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | HUANG Lanlan | 100% | 91% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 52 | BROOKS Tean R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% | |
| 53 | LEE Olivia | 100% | 91% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 54 | DALEY Keira | 100% | 56% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 55 | LENDIS Gabrielle | 100% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 56 | TAN Jocelyn | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 57 | MITRANI Gabriela | 100% | 84% | 40% | 7% | - | - | - |
| 58 | XU Katelyn | 100% | 87% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 59 | MANDAP Svetlanna | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 60 | NASON Amelia | 100% | 57% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 61 | LEE youngin | 100% | 74% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 62 | HAU Olivia | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 63 | LOUIE Sarah | 100% | 65% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 64 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | 100% | 57% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 65 | FRANEK Lisa | 100% | 76% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 66 | PERKINS-OLLILA Emily | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.