Jersey City, NJ - Jersey City, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | AHN Jun | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 21% | |
| 2 | PYO Michael M. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 38% |
| 3 | BELLUOMO David C. | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 39% | 14% | |
| 3 | ANTON Nathaniel | - | 4% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 5 | BUERGIN Aidan | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 12% | |
| 6 | WAN Jason | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
| 7 | LI Eric | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 8% | |
| 8 | TIAN Yuzhe (Charlie) | - | 4% | 22% | 43% | 27% | 4% | |
| 9 | LIN Richard W. | - | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 46% | |
| 10 | FU Samuel Y. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 45% | 22% | |
| 11 | MONTALVO-ZOTTER Gabriel M. | - | - | 8% | 32% | 42% | 17% | |
| 12 | TSIMIKLIS Yanni | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 4% |
| 13 | LIN James G. | - | 9% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | |
| 14 | LUH Ethan K. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
| 15 | DU Samuel R. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 9% |
| 16 | LIU Eric Y. | 2% | 20% | 43% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 17 | KWON Ethan | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 25% |
| 18 | RUSADZE Nickolas | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% |
| 19 | SHA Yi Peng | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 40% | 12% | |
| 20 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 45% | 32% | |
| 21 | GAO William | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 2% |
| 22 | HAN Lawrence | 1% | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 23 | BING Charles | - | - | 8% | 32% | 42% | 18% | |
| 24 | BOBROW Logan | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 37% | 22% | 5% |
| 25 | SIMA Congyu Josh | - | 10% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 26 | PAN Eric | 1% | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 27 | GUPTA Varun | - | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 28 | CAI Oliver K. | - | 8% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 29 | MENG Zhaoyi | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
| 30 | QI Steve | 10% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 31 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | - | 5% | 34% | 41% | 17% | 3% | |
| 32 | BADLANI Dev | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 33 | SONG Bryan | 11% | 43% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 34 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 23% | 61% | 15% | 1% | - | - | |
| 35 | TOMLINSON Clayton | 75% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 36 | POPE Alexander | 59% | 35% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 37 | WANG Winston | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 38 | KALIPERSAD Neil A. | 4% | 36% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 39 | PO Oliver | 4% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 39 | SHIKHMANQ Lennon | 6% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 41 | ZHAO Jesse | 5% | 41% | 38% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 42 | FRANK Amir | 66% | 32% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 43 | TSAI William | 83% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 44 | LIU Jeremiah | 68% | 30% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 44 | GRANADOS Luis | 64% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.