Freehold Fencing Academy - Freehold, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | MA Shuhe | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 38% | |
2 | ROLANDO Doc | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 41% |
3 | KUMAR Aidan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 8% |
3 | ARAVIND Athreya | 100% | 100% | 91% | 59% | 19% | 2% |
5 | MARTINEZ Joshua | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 15% | 1% |
6 | CONNELLY Michael | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 16% |
7 | GILLER Augustus | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
8 | CORRIDON Jack (John) | 100% | 99% | 79% | 39% | 9% | - |
9 | PETERS Nathan M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 31% |
10 | ANDERSON Riley | 100% | 100% | 89% | 52% | 12% | |
11 | SCHAPIRO Jake | 100% | 94% | 68% | 28% | 5% | |
12 | FURMAN Maria | 100% | 97% | 78% | 38% | 6% | |
13 | KHAN Raaid | 100% | 99% | 82% | 39% | 7% | |
14 | WOLFSOHN Peleg | 100% | 99% | 76% | 34% | 7% | - |
15 | SHULKIN Mark | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
16 | FUSSMAN Yuval | 100% | 83% | 42% | 10% | 1% | |
17 | SAKO Ayrton (A.J.) | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 6% | 1% |
18 | WEN Ethan | 100% | 91% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - |
19 | CHEN Michael | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 31% | 5% |
20 | LEVCHOOK Thomas | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 34% | |
21 | FURDA Lucas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% |
22 | LESSER Jeremy | 100% | 98% | 66% | 22% | 3% | |
23 | TAUBLER Michelle | 100% | 84% | 46% | 13% | 2% | |
24 | KRISHNAN Amudha | 100% | 98% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
25 | KUCHARCZYK Ryan | 100% | 86% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - |
26 | KRISHNAN Skanda | 100% | 12% | - | - | - | |
27 | PATEL Tania | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - |
27 | WINSLOW Michael | 100% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.