Ontario, CA - Ontario, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | NAGIMOV Marsel | V V V V D V | V V V V V V | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
| 2 | GASSNER Ethan I. | D V V V V V | V V V V V D | 5.8 | 5 | -0.8 |
| 3 | JEON Caleb A. | V D V V V V | V V V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 3 | KIM Brandon J. | V D V V V V | V V V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 5 | LI Raphael C. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
| 6 | CHEN Ziyuan | V V V V D V | V V V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
| 7 | BURKE Spencer W. | V D D V V V | V V V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
| 8 | NGUYEN Nish | D V V D V D | V V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 9 | ZENG Lucas H. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
| 10 | DIVITO Dylan | D V V V V V | V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 11 | CHIN Julian S. | V V V V D V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 12 | OH Samuel H. | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 13 | SCHULZE-KALT Graydon L. | V D V V V D | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 14 | TSANG Matthew K. | V D V D V V | V V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 15 | VAZQUEZ Zander | V D V D V D | V V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 16 | GODZHIK Zachary | V D V V D D | V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 17 | YU Anders | V V V V V V | V D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
| 18 | KO Brian J. | V V V D V V | V D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
| 19 | TSAY Jeremy M. | D V V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 20 | GOOR Julian | V D V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 21 | CHENG Matthew S. | V D V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 22 | LUH Ethan K. | V V V V V D | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 23 | DANKAR Neel | V V D V V V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 24 | CHAN Tyler | V V V V V D | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 25 | LIN Dashiell | V D V D V V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 26 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | V V V D D V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 27 | KIM Andrew J. | V V D V V D | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 28 | XIAO EDWARD | V D D V V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 29 | DIERKS Kian | V V D D V D | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 30 | SCHWIEBERT Michael F. | V D D D V V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 31 | JORDON Kaleb W. | V D V D V D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 32 | GOLDADE Luke A. | V D D V D V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 33 | DARIANO Noah G. | V D V V D V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 34 | JAIN Aditya | V V D V D V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 35 | LAO Scott E. | V V D V D V | D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 36 | DESAI Nalin H. | D V V D V V | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 37 | NAYGAS LAWRENCE I. | V D V V V D | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 38 | FIECHTNER Thomas A. | D V V V D D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 39 | CHENG Nathan | V D D V D V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 40 | JOHNSTON Conner S. | D V D V D V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 41 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | D V V D V D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 42 | O'BARR Kieran C. | D V V D V D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 43 | DETERING Julian | V V D D D V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 44 | GIRALDO Pablo E. | V D V V D D | D | 4.7 | 3 | -1.7 |
| 45 | MORALES Ian N. | V V D D V D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 46 | LE Jacob W. | V D D V V D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 46 | KIM Aaron J. | D D V V V D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 48 | PATINO Yahir | V V D D D V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 49 | WU Jerry Z. | D D V V V D | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 50 | HOSKERI Anik S. | D V V D D V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 51 | CANLAS Nathan | D D D V D V | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 52 | WU Conrad J. | V D V D D D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 53 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | D V D D D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 54 | WOO Christian | V D D D V D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 55 | ZHENG zhe | D V D D D V | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 56 | LI Avery Peihong | D V D D V D | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 57 | WANG Andrew | D D V D D D | V D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
| 58 | KIM Ryan Y. | D D D V D D | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 59 | PIESNER Zachary C. | D D D D V D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 60 | CHI Alexander | D D V D D D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 61 | MCCOSH Evin M. | D D D V D D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 62 | SEAL Maximus R. | D V D D D D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 63 | DINSAY Kristjan | D D D D D D | V D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 64 | KIM Derek A. | D D D D D D | V D | 2.8 | 0 | -2.8 |
| 65 | SADOVSKY Leor B. | D D D D V V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 66 | TAN Christien | D V D D V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 67 | BROWN Darius D. | D D D D V V | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 68 | GUO Hairuo | D V V D D D | D | 0.7 | 2 | +1.3 |
| 69 | CHUANG Kian J. | D D V D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 70 | ZHOU Hao Kai (Kevin) | V D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 71 | GOING Nicholas (Nick) S. | D V D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 72 | MO Jason | D D D D D V | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 73 | LIEBERMAN Grant | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 74 | RAINS Jackson T. | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
| 75 | PARK Sky | D D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
| 76 | NGUYEN William | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 76 | RODRIGUEZ VINCENT | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.