Ontario, CA - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | NAGIMOV Marsel | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 32% | 61% |
| 2 | GASSNER Ethan I. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 18% | 81% |
| 3 | JEON Caleb A. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 18% |
| 3 | KIM Brandon J. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% |
| 5 | LI Raphael C. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 21% |
| 6 | CHEN Ziyuan | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 45% | 44% |
| 7 | BURKE Spencer W. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 42% | 29% |
| 8 | NGUYEN Nish | - | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 9 | ZENG Lucas H. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 22% |
| 10 | DIVITO Dylan | - | - | - | 2% | 18% | 51% | 28% |
| 11 | CHIN Julian S. | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
| 12 | OH Samuel H. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 18% |
| 13 | SCHULZE-KALT Graydon L. | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 14 | TSANG Matthew K. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 23% |
| 15 | VAZQUEZ Zander | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 38% | 23% | 5% |
| 16 | GODZHIK Zachary | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 2% |
| 17 | YU Anders | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% |
| 18 | KO Brian J. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 57% |
| 19 | TSAY Jeremy M. | - | 1% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% |
| 20 | GOOR Julian | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 38% | 31% | 5% |
| 21 | CHENG Matthew S. | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
| 22 | LUH Ethan K. | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 4% |
| 23 | DANKAR Neel | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
| 24 | CHAN Tyler | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 39% | 29% | 5% |
| 25 | LIN Dashiell | - | - | 6% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
| 26 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% | 1% |
| 27 | KIM Andrew J. | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 28 | XIAO EDWARD | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
| 29 | DIERKS Kian | - | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 30 | SCHWIEBERT Michael F. | 3% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 31 | JORDON Kaleb W. | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 32 | GOLDADE Luke A. | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 33 | DARIANO Noah G. | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 34 | JAIN Aditya | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% |
| 35 | LAO Scott E. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
| 36 | DESAI Nalin H. | 1% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 37 | NAYGAS LAWRENCE I. | - | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 38 | FIECHTNER Thomas A. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 39 | CHENG Nathan | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 40 | JOHNSTON Conner S. | 8% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 41 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 42 | O'BARR Kieran C. | - | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 43 | DETERING Julian | 1% | 13% | 39% | 35% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 44 | GIRALDO Pablo E. | - | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 39% | 22% |
| 45 | MORALES Ian N. | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 46 | LE Jacob W. | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 46 | KIM Aaron J. | - | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | - |
| 48 | PATINO Yahir | 1% | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 49 | WU Jerry Z. | - | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 50 | HOSKERI Anik S. | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 51 | CANLAS Nathan | - | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 52 | WU Conrad J. | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 53 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 54 | WOO Christian | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 55 | ZHENG zhe | 4% | 34% | 40% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 56 | LI Avery Peihong | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 57 | WANG Andrew | - | 4% | 22% | 40% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 58 | KIM Ryan Y. | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 59 | PIESNER Zachary C. | 19% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 60 | CHI Alexander | 7% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 61 | MCCOSH Evin M. | 3% | 25% | 45% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 62 | SEAL Maximus R. | 15% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 63 | DINSAY Kristjan | 19% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 64 | KIM Derek A. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 65 | SADOVSKY Leor B. | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 66 | TAN Christien | 3% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 67 | BROWN Darius D. | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 68 | GUO Hairuo | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 69 | CHUANG Kian J. | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 70 | ZHOU Hao Kai (Kevin) | 46% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 71 | GOING Nicholas (Nick) S. | 32% | 46% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 72 | MO Jason | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 73 | LIEBERMAN Grant | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 74 | RAINS Jackson T. | 78% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 75 | PARK Sky | 90% | 9% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 76 | NGUYEN William | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 76 | RODRIGUEZ VINCENT | 25% | 46% | 25% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.