Riverside Hilton /Fitness by Hilton - New Orleans, LA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | FULLERTON Houston T. | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 32% |
2 | MOORE Jeremy S. | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 48% | 38% |
3 | CLARK Timothy J. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 7% |
3 | PHAM Sawyer T. | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
5 | LIOZNYANSKY Simon | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 39% | 13% | 1% |
6 | LEONE III Charles D. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 36% | 12% |
7 | KLEIN Hugo | - | - | - | 2% | 18% | 48% | 32% |
8 | JUNG Minche | 4% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 7% | - | - |
9 | ELLINGTON Keegan A. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% |
10 | OLIVERIUS Joseph W. | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% | |
11 | XU Alex | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 7% | |
12 | MUNLIN Donovan | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 43% |
13 | WEBB Jacob T. | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
14 | SAYLOR Harrison G. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% | |
15 | CHIZ Max H. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
16 | JACKSON James | 2% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - |
17 | KIM Dylan J. | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 25% | 6% | - |
18 | PARCELEWICZ John M. | 3% | 20% | 40% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
19 | SCHWARY Irv | 36% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | |
20 | SCHERNIKAU Jack | 8% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
21 | STEFANOV Michael A. | 8% | 35% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
22 | RUNGE Patrick A. | 29% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
23 | XIE Brandon | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
24 | RAY William | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
25 | ESHONKULOV Aziz | 54% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
26 | MA Bochen | 6% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
27 | DAVIS Campbell | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.