Evanston, IL - Evanston, IL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SHAH S Ayush | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% | |
| 2 | SMITH Jackson | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 19% | |
| 3 | SILVERS Noah E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 47% |
| 3 | JOVANOVIC Jovan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% | |
| 5 | GORIUNOV IVAN A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 35% | |
| 6 | HEIM Bryce | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 13% | 1% | |
| 7 | WU Byron | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% | |
| 8 | DIVERIS Joseph | 100% | 74% | 29% | 5% | - | - | |
| 9 | O'DONNELL Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 7% | |
| 10 | KRZYSIAK David F. | 100% | 92% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 11 | KRISTIANSEN Phillip | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 12 | OH Matthew M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 29% | 4% | |
| 13 | IVAKIMOV Vasil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 49% | |
| 14 | NGUYEN Tate | 100% | 98% | 81% | 42% | 11% | 1% | |
| 15 | KULIKOWSKI Adam J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 38% | 5% | |
| 16 | LOISEAU Eliott | 100% | 92% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 17 | MILLER Lance W. | 100% | 97% | 74% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
| 18 | SATTERFIELD Donald | 100% | 99% | 85% | 50% | 15% | 1% | |
| 19 | MCKEEVER Luca | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 33% | 5% | |
| 20 | KOZAKIEWICZ Filip | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 29% | 4% | |
| 21 | MEDINA Michael A. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 22 | VEZMAR Evan H. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% | |
| 23 | THOMAS Samuel | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 15% | 1% | |
| 24 | WANG David | 100% | 80% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | TIKHOMIROV Theodore | 100% | 94% | 54% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 26 | NIKOLOV Peter | 100% | 98% | 77% | 33% | 6% | - | |
| 27 | NESTEROV Andrew E. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 14% | 1% |
| 28 | PRABHAKAR Agasthya | 100% | 72% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 29 | LI Chenyu | 100% | 97% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 30 | TOPAZ Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 31 | DENNIS Ethan | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 19% | 2% | |
| 32 | LITWILLER Joseph | 100% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 33 | BRADFORD Ethan | 100% | 76% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 34 | SONN Rohan | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
| 35 | CORRALES Victor M. | 100% | 74% | 30% | 6% | - | - | |
| 36 | TASKIRAN Mete | 100% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 37 | SAHA Sayan | 100% | 84% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.