King of Prussia, PA - King of Prussia, PA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LOYOLA TORRIENTE Padick | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
2 | KUMAR Anitya | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 32% | 11% | |
3 | IVAKIMOV Vasil | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 15% | |
3 | CHONG christopher | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
5 | SZAPARY Tristan B. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 19% | 79% |
6 | WU Joseph | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
7 | ADLER Ian B. | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% | |
8 | JIN Owen | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 16% |
9 | YUROVCHAK Andrew T. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 40% | 25% | |
10 | CLARK Ethan J. | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
11 | MISHIMA Torata | 10% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% | |
12 | LEHR William D. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 8% |
13 | DOLMETSCH Max | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | |
14 | SUICO Zachary Emanuel O. | - | 5% | 18% | 34% | 32% | 11% | |
15 | SMITH Nicholas S. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% | |
16 | SITBON-TAYLOR Noe B. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | |
17 | GAO Daniel | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - |
18 | JEYOON Ryan S. | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 1% |
19 | KROPP Jack | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
20 | RICHARD Owen | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% | - |
21 | TUCKER Owen J. | 8% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
22 | SIMPSON Patrick | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | |
23 | MORSE Tyler | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | |
24 | BLAKE Randall K. | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
25 | CHOI Mason | 2% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
26 | ZHAO corey | 18% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | |
27 | DIXON Samuel | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
28 | PAHLAVI Kamran | 10% | 34% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
29 | SJOSTEDT Jacob H. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% |
30 | LAI Coby | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - | |
30 | SHIV Rishi | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | |
32 | LUKANYUK Lorence | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
33 | WISCHNIA Jacob I. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% | |
34 | KIM Byung | 16% | 37% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - | |
35 | BUSH Thomas | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | |
36 | PARK Brian | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | |
37 | GREGORY Abram | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 10% | - |
38 | STEFANOV Michael A. | 2% | 19% | 38% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - |
38 | COETZEE Frans M. | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
40 | WU Jonathan | 35% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
41 | CHAWLA Armaan | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% | |
42 | MAGDA Daniel | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
43 | ZHANG William | 49% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - | - |
44 | DISIMONE David Z. | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | |
45 | FENG du | 76% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.