The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

South Coast RJCC

Junior Men's Foil

Saturday, November 20, 2021 at 12:00 PM

Pasadena Convention Center - Visitors Center - Pasadena, CA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 CHEN Ziyuan - - - - - 10% 89%
2 DARIANO Noah G. - - - 2% 16% 44% 38%
3 DIERKS Kian - - 1% 7% 30% 43% 19%
3 SCHULZE-KALT Graydon L. - - - 3% 17% 45% 35%
5 LEVY Jacob M. - - - - - 11% 88%
6 GODZHIK Zachary - - - 2% 13% 39% 46%
7 KUO Evan - - 8% 35% 43% 14%
8 MUSHER Benjamin J. - - 3% 18% 42% 30% 6%
9 SIU Aiden - - - 4% 24% 48% 23%
10 OTAKE Jared K. - - - 1% 9% 39% 51%
11 JAIN Aditya - - - 1% 9% 38% 52%
12 CANLAS Nathan - - 1% 7% 30% 48% 14%
13 WOO Christian - 1% 7% 24% 38% 26% 5%
14 HOBSON Aaron K. - - 1% 13% 43% 43%
15 LUH Ethan K. - 1% 6% 23% 42% 28%
16 JORDON Kaleb W. - - 3% 15% 37% 37% 9%
17 CHENG Matthew S. - - - 2% 14% 43% 42%
18 SUNG Chang-Han S. - - - 2% 14% 45% 40%
19 GIRALDO Pablo E. - - - - 6% 36% 57%
20 KIM Derek A. - - 4% 19% 42% 33% 2%
21 LI Avery Peihong - 2% 15% 36% 34% 12% 1%
22 VALOUEV Aleksey - - 12% 43% 37% 8%
23 CHI Alexander 2% 13% 32% 34% 16% 3%
24 YEE Johnathan - 1% 13% 37% 37% 11% 1%
25 CHENG Nathan - - 2% 15% 38% 35% 10%
25 VARGAS Bryan - - 1% 9% 33% 44% 14%
27 ZHOU Hao Kai 1% 11% 34% 36% 16% 3% -
27 DETERING Julian - - 1% 9% 34% 42% 14%
29 TSAY Jeremy M. - - 1% 5% 25% 46% 23%
30 GUARDIA Gabriel - - 1% 11% 32% 39% 16%
31 ANDERSON Jacob - 3% 18% 42% 30% 7% -
32 CHUANG Kian J. - 1% 12% 37% 36% 12% 1%
33 ZHOU Oscar J. - - 1% 7% 28% 45% 20%
34 FINNEY Lorenz - 1% 11% 36% 38% 13% 1%
35 SMITH Grant D. 2% 12% 33% 36% 15% 2% -
36 LI Jett 1% 7% 26% 41% 21% 4% -
37 DINSAY Kristjan - 3% 21% 42% 29% 6% -
38 PIESNER Zachary C. - 3% 14% 33% 35% 13% 2%
39 ZHENG zhe - 1% 9% 30% 40% 18% 2%
40 HARRIS Otto 19% 39% 30% 10% 2% -
41 TEH Ryan - 3% 47% 39% 10% 1%
42 MCCOSH Evin M. 4% 21% 36% 28% 9% 1%
43 KHER Roan - 1% 15% 41% 32% 10% 1%
44 NGUYEN Liam - 6% 26% 40% 23% 4% -
45 RENTERIA Emiliano - 1% 7% 30% 42% 18% 2%
46 PARK Sky 6% 32% 39% 19% 4% - -
47 LLIDO Soren - - 5% 23% 44% 26% 1%
48 LE Jacob W. - 3% 16% 34% 32% 13% 2%
49 CHEN Justin K. 1% 14% 34% 33% 15% 3% -
49 MO Jason - 2% 12% 34% 38% 13% -
51 MYERS Dean 1% 13% 36% 35% 13% 2% -
52 AIKEN Nicholas A. 2% 14% 33% 34% 14% 2% -
53 BAEK David - - 4% 21% 44% 30% 1%
54 YU Leo 2% 15% 36% 33% 12% 2% -
55 OH Jaden - 3% 37% 41% 17% 3% -
56 FINLEY Dylan - 3% 18% 38% 31% 9% 1%
57 WANG Ethan - 7% 26% 36% 23% 6% 1%
58 TUAN Evan 7% 29% 38% 21% 5% - -
59 BERSHIN Izzy 1% 14% 46% 31% 8% 1% -
60 GONZALEZ Matthew 1% 10% 37% 37% 14% 2% -
61 GOLDADE Luke A. - 5% 20% 37% 30% 8%
62 RAINS Jackson T. 32% 44% 20% 3% - - -
63 EDISON Ansel 13% 39% 36% 11% 1% - -
64 HAGHIGHAT KASHANI Farzad 66% 28% 5% - - - -
65 SCHIENEMAN Valentine 9% 32% 38% 18% 3% - -
66 ELVANDER Ethan 10% 35% 38% 15% 2% - -
67 BLAM Matthew 11% 52% 30% 6% - - -
68 BRENNAN Ty 7% 30% 42% 18% 3% - -
69 BEECHER Keegan 55% 43% 2% - - -
70 KALAMAS Nikolas 39% 43% 16% 3% - - -
71 QIU Jay 22% 46% 27% 5% - - -
72 BARTSCH Henry 18% 52% 25% 4% - - -
73 NAM Michael 4% 21% 37% 28% 9% 1% -
74 MAK Osman K. 5% 41% 38% 13% 2% - -
75 TAN Peter 2% 16% 35% 32% 13% 2% -
76 NGUYEN William 33% 42% 20% 4% - - -
77 CHEN Brian 1% 12% 35% 36% 14% 2% -
78 BOUCHARD Kai 18% 43% 30% 8% 1% - -
79 KIM Jonah 28% 65% 7% - - - -
80 WONG Luke S. 9% 30% 36% 20% 5% -
81 HAHN Jacob 36% 44% 17% 3% - - -
82 PETERSON Lucas 31% 46% 20% 3% - - -
82 GREENEBAUM Oliver 60% 33% 6% 1% - - -
84 ALBINALI Eissa 72% 26% 2% - - - -
85 GRITCHEN Alex 40% 57% 3% - - -
86 COUFAL Christian 60% 35% 5% - - - -
87 KHAZEI Kian 3% 26% 44% 23% 4% - -
88 OPATKIEWICZ Aidan 68% 32% 1% - - - -
89 DROPKIN Mason 76% 22% 2% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.