Round Rock, TX - Round Rock, TX, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHOUN Minwook | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% |
| 2 | CHEN Andrew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 22% | 4% |
| 3 | XIAO Enoch A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 20% |
| 3 | DESERANNO Jeidus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% |
| 5 | SONG Aiden S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 89% |
| 6 | SONG Dylan S. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
| 7 | JEON Caleb A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 80% | 48% | 14% |
| 8 | MURRAY Maximo | 100% | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 9 | XIAO Ethan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 31% |
| 11 | REYES Omar | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 52% | |
| 12 | MITCHELL Philip D. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 9% | - |
| 13 | WANG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 91% | 69% | 35% | 9% |
| 14 | GODZHIK Zachary | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 12% | |
| 15 | CHAN Tyler | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 41% | ||
| 16 | XIAO EDWARD | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 17 | FUKUDA Renzo K. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 6% |
| 18 | GRAHAM Roy J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% |
| 19 | LUH Ethan K. | 100% | 97% | 76% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
| 20 | ZHANG Andy W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% | 20% | |
| 21 | CHEN Allen | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
| 22 | TSAY Jeremy M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 23% | 3% |
| 23 | NEWELL Ian A. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 24 | KUO Evan | 100% | 80% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 25 | GORBACHEV Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% |
| 26 | MASCARI DUMONT Louis | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 29% | 5% | - |
| 27 | GOH Andrew Y. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 28 | OH Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 23% | 4% |
| 29 | LAKE Wyatt J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 19% | 2% |
| 30 | LI Peihong | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 33% | 6% | - |
| 31 | LI Richard | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 18% | |
| 32 | LEE Aidan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 64% | 19% | 2% | |
| 33 | KEE Andrew L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% |
| 34 | REEVES Liam | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 7% | - |
| 35 | MASCARI DUMONT Alexandre | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 36 | GAO Ryan | 100% | 98% | 76% | 34% | 6% | ||
| 37 | DAI Jonathan T. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% | |
| 38 | ZHOU Oscar J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 31% | 7% |
| 39 | XIANG Derrick | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 6% | - |
| 40 | YANG Luao | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 14% |
| 41 | MEJIA MATTHEW D. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 42 | JIANG Owen | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 43 | DORAN Wesley C. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 47% | 17% | 3% |
| 43 | STEVENS Paul S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 30% | 1% |
| 45 | KIM BANSEOK | 100% | 97% | 73% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 46 | GILLIAM Jason E. | 100% | 99% | 79% | 34% | 6% | - | |
| 47 | BATANG Cergio Manuel A. | 100% | 99% | 84% | 45% | 8% | ||
| 48 | SCHOENBERGER Xander S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% | 1% |
| 49 | HUANG Kevin D. | 100% | 94% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 50 | ELKOUSY Laith H. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 51 | MENG Zhaoyi | 100% | 88% | 57% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 52 | FINNEY Lorenz | 100% | 100% | 85% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 53 | AIBEL Hudson J. | 100% | 93% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 54 | IVES William R. | 100% | 96% | 51% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 55 | HEARN Christen J. | 100% | 94% | 62% | 21% | 2% | ||
| 56 | ZHENG Jadon | 100% | 81% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 57 | KISS Phillip A. | 100% | 88% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 58 | KIM Derek A. | 100% | 92% | 64% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 58 | ZHOU Joseph H. | 100% | 85% | 47% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 60 | KIM Ryan Y. | 100% | 67% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 61 | LIU Michael H. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 62 | OH Joshua | 100% | 88% | 51% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 63 | PIERCE Cody | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 64 | BAO Aaron | 100% | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 65 | WEEKS Richard P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 28% |
| 66 | CHIN Ryan | 100% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 67 | SEALE Cougar | 100% | 76% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 68 | SHAH Shrey | 100% | 40% | 6% | - | - | ||
| 69 | ZHENG zhe | 100% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 70 | PRASANNA Advaith | 100% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 71 | CUTTER Jackson | 100% | 69% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 73 | XU Ethan | 100% | 7% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 74 | APPL Eli | 100% | 78% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.