Anaheim, CA - Anaheim, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEVY Jacob M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 22% |
| 2 | BURKE Spencer W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 24% | |
| 3 | AYUPOV Ilya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% | |
| 3 | OTAKE Jared K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% | |
| 5 | KUMBLA Samarth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 25% | |
| 6 | BANERJEE ANUP | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 18% |
| 7 | KELLY William J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 26% |
| 8 | DARIANO Noah G. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 14% | 1% | |
| 9 | GRIFFIN John O. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 71% |
| 10 | LAO Scott E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 17% | |
| 11 | GOOR Julian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 4% |
| 12 | CHIN Jason Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 38% | |
| 13 | ZENG Lucas H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 38% |
| 14 | FUKUDA Alessio R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 45% | 9% |
| 15 | JAIN Aditya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% |
| 16 | FUKUDA Renzo K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 17% | |
| 17 | JEON Caleb A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% |
| 18 | DIERKS Kian | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 12% | 1% |
| 19 | GRANT Lachlan K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 19% | |
| 20 | CHIN Julian S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 33% | 5% |
| 21 | KIM Brandon J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% | |
| 22 | KO Brian J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% |
| 23 | DICKSON Farr R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 52% |
| 24 | TSANG Matthew K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 16% |
| 25 | OH Samuel H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 68% | 20% |
| 26 | HAN Andersen Y. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 27 | MURUHIN Yaroslav | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 28 | LI Raphael C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 44% | 6% |
| 29 | ZHENG Alan H. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 9% | |
| 30 | HOBSON Aaron K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
| 31 | ZHANG Luke T. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 27% | 4% | |
| 32 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% | 8% | - | |
| 33 | VAZQUEZ Zander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 24% | 4% |
| 34 | KIM Aaron J. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 49% | 11% | 1% | |
| 35 | GIRALDO Pablo E. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 10% | |
| 36 | DIVITO Dylan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 46% | |
| 37 | XIAO EDWARD | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
| 38 | PAEK Alex J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 22% |
| 39 | WU Jerry Z. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 22% | 3% |
| 40 | HONG Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 5% |
| 41 | HODESS Ethan | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 11% | 1% | |
| 42 | CHENG Matthew S. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 20% | 3% | |
| 43 | SODERBERG Alex Z. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
| 44 | PHAM-CHANG Duke A. | 100% | 88% | 53% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 44 | YU Anders | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 5% | |
| 46 | SCHULZE-KALT Graydon L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 16% | 1% |
| 47 | KELLY Benjamin J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 5% |
| 48 | GOLDADE Luke A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 34% | 7% | - |
| 49 | KUZMAK Michael J. | 100% | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 50 | THAI William | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 22% | 3% |
| 51 | MO Jason | 100% | 97% | 75% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 52 | CAI Jason Zhicheng | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 21% | 3% | |
| 53 | WU Conrad J. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 13% | 1% | |
| 54 | TSAY Jeremy M. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 3% | |
| 55 | JOHNSTON Conner S. | 100% | 94% | 61% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 56 | WANG Andrew | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 57 | ZHENG zhe | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 6% | - | - |
| 58 | PIESNER Zachary C. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 59 | KIM Ryan Y. | 100% | 98% | 76% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 60 | HSIUNG Richie | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 61 | LE Jacob W. | 100% | 78% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 62 | PATINO Yahir | 100% | 81% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 63 | LLIDO Soren | 100% | 83% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 64 | NGUYEN Liam | 100% | 87% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 65 | FARQUHARSON Cole | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 3% |
| 65 | DETERING Julian | 100% | 98% | 76% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 67 | KIM Derek A. | 100% | 98% | 74% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 68 | KIM Banseok J. | 100% | 90% | 47% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 69 | BARTEL Jacob L. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 19% | 3% | |
| 70 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 71 | HUANG Kevin D. | 100% | 99% | 70% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 72 | BAEK David | 100% | 99% | 86% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 73 | GOBBO Alexander | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 74 | LIEBERMAN Grant | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 75 | OH Jaden | 100% | 63% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 76 | MCCOSH Evin M. | 100% | 89% | 48% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 77 | JEFFERY Jakob | 100% | 50% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 78 | LI Avery Peihong | 100% | 80% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 79 | LIM Charles Q. | 100% | 79% | 31% | 5% | - | - | |
| 80 | LI Ryan Z. | 100% | 93% | 58% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 81 | AVRON Case B. | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 82 | DORMAN Patrick | 100% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 83 | RAINS Jackson T. | 100% | 20% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 84 | BERK Theodore | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 85 | PIALLING Mikhail | 100% | 9% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 86 | PARK Gabriel | 100% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 87 | WOMACH Tristan | 100% | 72% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
| 88 | GUO Hairuo | 100% | 56% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 89 | CHUANG Kian J. | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 90 | HARRIS Rhonen | 100% | 37% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 91 | GOING Nicholas (Nick) S. | 100% | 95% | 51% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 92 | QIU Jay (Tengjie) | 100% | 33% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.