Anaheim, CA - Anaheim, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | MA Victor | V V V V D | V V V V V | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 2 | KIM Benjamin I. | V D V V V | V V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 3 | BUI James H. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
| 3 | AHN Gus | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 5 | JAIN Sarthak | V V V D V V | V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 6 | JOHNSTON Conner S. | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 7 | HARR Carver | D V V V D | V V V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 8 | LATIF IMRAN ZAKARIYYA | V D V D D | V V V D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
| 9 | AU Marcus J. | V V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 10 | GALLO James | V V V D V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 11 | JONES Caleb | V V D V V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 12 | CRAFT Marshall | V V D V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 13 | DOLMETSCH Max | D V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 14 | MADSEN Jr Eric W. | V V D V V D | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 15 | KIM Darius H. | V D V V D | V V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 16 | WEAVER Neil | D V D V V | V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 17 | STRAUSS Luke | V V V V V V | D | 3.5 | 6 | +2.5 |
| 18 | TARBUSKOVICH III John | V V V D D V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 19 | LO Hung Yui | D V V V V D | V D | 5.4 | 4 | -1.4 |
| 20 | IGNACIO David | V D D V V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 21 | PHUKAN Rohin | D D V V V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 22 | KIM Sterling S. | V D V D D V | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 23 | LOGUE Andrew E. | V D D V V D | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 24 | LIANG Aaron | V D V V D D | V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
| 25 | ZHENG Haoran | V D D D V | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 26 | COOPER Rowan | D D D V V | V D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
| 27 | KOPPE Alexander | V D D D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 28 | FAN Beichen | D V V D D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 29 | WANG DEVON | D V D D D | V D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 30 | GAURIAT Olivier | D V D D D | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 31 | LOCASALE Nicholas A. | D D V D D | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 32 | CHUANG Kenneth H. | D D D D D | V D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
| 33 | LEE Chun Po | D V V D V V | D | 1.1 | 4 | +2.9 |
| 34 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | V V V D D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 35 | STENNIS Brendan | D V D V D V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 36 | BRUSKOTTER Reiland | D V V V D D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 37 | JIN Daniel | D V V D D | D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 38 | KIM Sullivan | V D D V D | D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 39 | LIU Bobby P. | D D V D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 40 | SIMONI James (Jim) V. | D V D V D D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 41 | BHARGAV Siddharth | D D D D V V | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 42 | BAXTER David | V D D D V D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 43 | WIEGAND-SHAHANI Braden M. | D D V D V D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 44 | GU Aidan | D V D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 45 | CROSSMAN Brandon | D D D D V | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 46 | BEAMS Yevgeny | D D D V D | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
| 47 | CHRISTENSEN Parker | V D D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 48 | VILLALOBOSKOWALSKI Demetrious C. | D D D D D V | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 49 | WANG owen | D D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 50 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 51 | COMER Alexander J. | D D D D D D | D | 2.7 | 0 | -2.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.