Anaheim, CA - Anaheim, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | NAGIMOV Marsel | - | - | - | - | 3% | 23% | 75% |
| 2 | ZENG Lucas H. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% |
| 3 | CHENG Matthew S. | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% | |
| 3 | VAZQUEZ Zander | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 45% | 20% |
| 5 | GOOR Julian | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 18% | |
| 6 | KIM Brandon J. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 52% |
| 7 | GRANT Lachlan K. | - | - | - | 5% | 21% | 42% | 31% |
| 8 | CAI Jason Zhicheng | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 9 | LI Raphael C. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 45% | 34% |
| 10 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 38% | 19% | 3% |
| 11 | MURUHIN Yaroslav | - | 2% | 22% | 43% | 28% | 6% | |
| 11 | GOBBO Alexander | 1% | 11% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 2% | |
| 13 | YU Anders | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 42% | 25% | |
| 14 | CHIN Julian S. | - | - | 4% | 23% | 47% | 26% | |
| 15 | FUKUDA Alessio R. | - | - | 3% | 20% | 46% | 31% | |
| 16 | BERK Theodore | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 2% |
| 17 | TSAY Jeremy M. | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 37% | 13% | |
| 18 | CHI Alexander | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 19 | DARIANO Noah G. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 35% | 10% |
| 20 | JEON Caleb A. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 51% |
| 21 | ZHANG Luke T. | - | - | 3% | 19% | 46% | 33% | |
| 22 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | - | 6% | 29% | 42% | 19% | 3% | |
| 23 | WU Jerry Z. | - | - | 6% | 26% | 45% | 23% | |
| 24 | DIERKS Kian | - | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 32% | 7% |
| 25 | GODZHIK Zachary | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 32% | 7% |
| 26 | LAO Scott E. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 23% | |
| 27 | PIESNER Zachary C. | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - | |
| 28 | JAIN Aditya | - | - | 11% | 36% | 40% | 13% | |
| 29 | HOBSON Aaron K. | - | 3% | 29% | 43% | 22% | 3% | |
| 30 | LE Jacob W. | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 31 | SADOVSKY Leor B. | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 2% |
| 32 | WANG Andrew | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
| 33 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 4% |
| 34 | ANDERSON Jacob | 38% | 41% | 17% | 4% | - | < 1% | - |
| 35 | GIRALDO Pablo E. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 35% | |
| 36 | DETERING Julian | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 2% |
| 37 | KIM Derek A. | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 38 | OH Jaden | 9% | 46% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | LEE David Y. | - | 13% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
| 40 | LIM Charles Q. | 3% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
| 41 | XIAO EDWARD | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 41% | 18% | |
| 42 | NGUYEN Liam | 11% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 43 | KIM Ryan Y. | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 44 | TAN Peter | 2% | 18% | 41% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 45 | WOO Christian | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 46 | JI Evan | 4% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 47 | SIU Aiden | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 2% |
| 48 | ZHOU Oscar J. | - | 7% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 4% | |
| 49 | HUANG Kevin D. | 6% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 50 | KANG Anthony | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 4% | |
| 51 | KIM Banseok J. | - | 6% | 27% | 42% | 21% | 3% | |
| 52 | CHUANG Kian J. | 1% | 14% | 41% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
| 52 | BROWN Darius D. | 29% | 47% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 54 | RYOU Aiden | - | 5% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 7% | - |
| 55 | ZHENG zhe | 1% | 9% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 56 | SEAL Maximus R. | - | 3% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 57 | LLIDO Soren | 1% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 58 | MO Jason | - | 7% | 26% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 59 | HARRIS Rhonen | 5% | 73% | 20% | 2% | - | - | |
| 60 | LIEBERMAN Grant | 21% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 61 | CHEN Brian | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 62 | HARRIS Otto | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 63 | NAM Michael | 30% | 45% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 64 | WANG Ethan | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 65 | LI Avery Peihong | 1% | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 66 | BAEK David | 1% | 23% | 41% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
| 67 | HUANG Zijian | 5% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 68 | DAHI Arman | 10% | 54% | 30% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 69 | QIU Jay (Tengjie) | 63% | 31% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 70 | PARK Sky | 92% | 8% | - | - | - | - | |
| 71 | MYERS Dean | 26% | 46% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 72 | QUITORIANO Matthew | 23% | 46% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 73 | ULLOA Trent J. | 71% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 74 | SMITH Grant D. | 18% | 39% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 74 | RAINS Jackson T. | 50% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 74 | CHRISTENSEN Parker | 14% | 55% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 77 | ALVES Austin | 93% | 7% | - | - | - | - | |
| 78 | EDISON Ansel | 77% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.