Anaheim, CA - Anaheim, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | NAGIMOV Marsel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% |
2 | ZENG Lucas H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% |
3 | CHENG Matthew S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% | |
3 | VAZQUEZ Zander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 20% |
5 | GOOR Julian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 18% | |
6 | KIM Brandon J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% |
7 | GRANT Lachlan K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 31% |
8 | CAI Jason Zhicheng | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
9 | LI Raphael C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 34% |
10 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 22% | 3% |
11 | MURUHIN Yaroslav | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% | 33% | 6% | |
11 | GOBBO Alexander | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 18% | 2% | |
13 | YU Anders | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% | |
14 | CHIN Julian S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 26% | |
15 | FUKUDA Alessio R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 31% | |
16 | BERK Theodore | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 2% |
17 | TSAY Jeremy M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 13% | |
18 | CHI Alexander | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - |
19 | DARIANO Noah G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 10% |
20 | JEON Caleb A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 51% |
21 | ZHANG Luke T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 33% | |
22 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 22% | 3% | |
23 | WU Jerry Z. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 23% | |
24 | DIERKS Kian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 7% |
25 | GODZHIK Zachary | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 7% |
26 | LAO Scott E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 23% | |
27 | PIESNER Zachary C. | 100% | 91% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - | |
28 | JAIN Aditya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 89% | 53% | 13% | |
29 | HOBSON Aaron K. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 68% | 25% | 3% | |
30 | LE Jacob W. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
31 | SADOVSKY Leor B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 20% | 2% |
32 | WANG Andrew | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 21% | 3% | |
33 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 28% | 4% |
34 | ANDERSON Jacob | 100% | 62% | 21% | 4% | - | < 1% | - |
35 | GIRALDO Pablo E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 35% | |
36 | DETERING Julian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
37 | KIM Derek A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
38 | OH Jaden | 100% | 91% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | |
39 | LEE David Y. | 100% | 100% | 87% | 51% | 16% | 2% | |
40 | LIM Charles Q. | 100% | 97% | 76% | 35% | 7% | 1% | |
41 | XIAO EDWARD | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 18% | |
42 | NGUYEN Liam | 100% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
43 | KIM Ryan Y. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - |
44 | TAN Peter | 100% | 98% | 80% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - |
45 | WOO Christian | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - |
46 | JI Evan | 100% | 96% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
47 | SIU Aiden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 22% | 2% |
48 | ZHOU Oscar J. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 26% | 4% | |
49 | HUANG Kevin D. | 100% | 94% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - | |
50 | KANG Anthony | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% | |
51 | KIM Banseok J. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 24% | 3% | |
52 | CHUANG Kian J. | 100% | 99% | 85% | 44% | 10% | 1% | |
52 | BROWN Darius D. | 100% | 71% | 24% | 3% | - | - | |
54 | RYOU Aiden | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 7% | - |
55 | ZHENG zhe | 100% | 99% | 91% | 57% | 19% | 3% | - |
56 | SEAL Maximus R. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 34% | 7% | 1% |
57 | LLIDO Soren | 100% | 99% | 81% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
58 | MO Jason | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 5% | - |
59 | HARRIS Rhonen | 100% | 95% | 21% | 2% | - | - | |
60 | LIEBERMAN Grant | 100% | 79% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | |
61 | CHEN Brian | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
62 | HARRIS Otto | 100% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
63 | NAM Michael | 100% | 70% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
64 | WANG Ethan | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
65 | LI Avery Peihong | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - |
66 | BAEK David | 100% | 99% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
67 | HUANG Zijian | 100% | 95% | 71% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - |
68 | DAHI Arman | 100% | 90% | 36% | 6% | - | - | - |
69 | QIU Jay (Tengjie) | 100% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
70 | PARK Sky | 100% | 8% | - | - | - | - | |
71 | MYERS Dean | 100% | 74% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
72 | QUITORIANO Matthew | 100% | 77% | 31% | 6% | - | - | |
73 | ULLOA Trent J. | 100% | 29% | 3% | - | - | - | |
74 | SMITH Grant D. | 100% | 82% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
74 | RAINS Jackson T. | 100% | 50% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
74 | CHRISTENSEN Parker | 100% | 86% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - |
77 | ALVES Austin | 100% | 7% | - | - | - | - | |
78 | EDISON Ansel | 100% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.