San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CANLAS Nathan | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 65% |
2 | KANG Anthony | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 45% | 37% |
3 | CORTRIGHT Skipper (Matthew) | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
3 | LO Preston | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 3% |
5 | CHOI Ethan | - | - | - | 5% | 25% | 46% | 23% |
6 | CO Dylan | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 39% | 16% | 2% |
7 | FANG Jaden | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 15% | 1% |
8 | FUKUDA Diego | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
9 | ZHANG Jiening G. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% |
10 | AGRAWAL Niki | 2% | 12% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
11 | SISINNI Riccardo | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 6% | - |
12 | CHENG Jonathan | - | 7% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
13 | WU Alber Y. | - | 9% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
14 | RASMUSSEN Sage | - | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
15 | NGUYEN martin | 6% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
16 | TSAY Jordan R. | 1% | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | - |
17 | CHUN Dashel | 22% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
18 | UPENDER West | 38% | 43% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
19 | SONG Matthew | 11% | 38% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
19 | HE Bourne | 25% | 44% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
21 | ROSEN Benjamin | 81% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.